Public Lab has received support for fellows to work on Public Lab software projects via several "Summer of Code" style programs including [Google's Summer of Code program](https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com) -- 2021 is our eighth great year of open-source coding with GSoC! In 2017 and 2018 we also joined the [Rails Girls Summer of Code](https://railsgirlssummerofcode.org/) program, and in 2018 we participated in [Outreachy](https://outreachy.org). This is a key way that we are able to develop our collaborative platform (this website) as well as [other Public Lab coding projects](/developers). > We especially welcome contributions from people from groups underrepresented in free and open source software! ## How to apply Want to get involved? As a first step, **we ask everyone to complete a “first-timers-only” issue**, which you can find on our Welcome page at https://code.publiclab.org. While it’s helpful to have some experience with the Git version tracking system, we have [guides to help you go through this process](/developers#Resources), and will be there to help you get your code posted. Almost all of our code is in Ruby on Rails and JavaScript, so basic familiarity with these systems is a plus. We have a chatroom at https://publiclab.org/chat where you can get help pretty much any time. **** ### Project ideas We kick off each season with a big brainstorm of ideas. You can find this year's discussion here: (Coming soon!) Last years can be found here: https://github.com/publiclab/plots2/issues/7360 Our [Summer of Code Ideas Page](/gsoc-ideas) will list the **final brainstormed ideas** that come out of this process. **** ### Call for proposals We have not yet opened our call for proposals, but [you can read last year's here](https://github.com/publiclab/plots2/issues/6285), to get ready! Feel free to ask questions there as well until the 2020 call is posted. Thanks! You can see past years' calls for proposals lists here: https://publiclab.org/tag/call-for-proposals The call for proposals asks people to post their proposals using this template: https://publiclab.org/gsoc-application-template We encourage people to leave comments, encouragement, tips, and questions on each others' proposals in a community fashion, and to be **friendly and welcoming** to one another! **** ## How we work Over recent years, we’ve steadily refined a workflow that helps new contributors get plugged into our community and code with a warm welcome, and aims to support building skills incrementally and cooperatively. We’re always looking for ways to improve, and welcome feedback! Once you are comfortable with our workflow by completing a `first-timers-only` issue (see above) we’d like to ask that you compile your project steps into a planning issue, which [you can learn about here](/notes/warren/01-18-2018/software-outreach-modularity-is-great-for-collaboration). You can see examples here: https://github.com/publiclab/plots2/labels/planning At this point, we recommend you begin going through the task list, creating a pull request like a mini-project for each task. Each one will ideally have tests, and we can help you develop these. As you progress, we encourage contributors to grow as leaders by reviewing others’ pull requests, helping troubleshoot, and also taking small parts of your project to post as “first-timers-issues” for someone else. You can read more about these steps at https://publiclab.org/software-outreach and https://github.com/publiclab/plots2/labels/support. Your code will be reviewed, supported and troubleshooted (troubleshot?) and potentially published to our live site as often as once a week, and you’ll be able to see it running and get feedback from people about it to inform your work. Towards the end of your project, we’ll encourage you to take remaining pieces you’d like to see followed-up on in the future, and describe them with enough information for others to take up and complete. This could be in the form of “first-timers-only” issues, or “break-me-up” issues that list out steps that can be adapted into small stand-alone tasks. ### What makes a good project Hi all, at Public Lab, @emash and @warren brainstormed on this a bit, and we felt that a good project: - can be broken into smaller parts that can be merged into our main branch on at least a weekly basis - could be completed as a "small" initial version (MVP) that is later expanded on or refined - has an integrated recruitment plan, i.e. the student has plans to recruit others into the project and designs the project for this - has background/context/historic info readily available to inform the work - is generally self contained - all the code in one place (or clear integration guidelines provided) - contributes to our software roadmap - (stability, maintainability, low technical debt, legible: https://publiclab.org/notes/warren/05-22-2019/draft-of-a-public-lab-software-roadmap-comments-welcome) - solves priority issues for Public Lab's broader community - provides a feeling of accomplishment! - helps students build skills/portfolio - is a "cool new thing" (but not all the projects we NEED done fulfill this...!) - has a good plan for integration/publication to the live production environment, and schedules time for this ### Evaluations We've posted various guidance on how we do evaluations in our Summer of Code programs. Here is a short collection of suggestions and info! * https://github.com/publiclab/plots2/issues/5930 * https://publiclab.org/notes/warren/08-20-2019/wrapping-up-outreachy-and-gsoc-2019 ## Using Milestones and Planning issues You have been selected for the Summer of Code Program, congratulations! The first thing you should think about in your first week is breaking down your projects into small chunks. Use this link as a resource on how to break down the tasks needed for your project https://publiclab.org/notes/warren/01-18-2018/software-outreach-modularity-is-great-for-collaboration Once you have broken down your tasks, the next thing to do is create an issue to list all the tasks needed for your project. You could use a format similar to these issues: * https://github.com/publiclab/plots2/issues/8513 * https://github.com/publiclab/plots2/issues/9069 Using the checklists and creating an issue for each task before the implementation period helps the mentors know what is expected and they can also help you break down or modify the tasks. Please also note that the tasks do get updated, modified, or added throughout the project, you need to be flexible and adaptable to that. Also, we encourage you to create a milestone that will track the progress of your completed task. Once a task is completed and marked as done on the issue checklist, or an issue /PR has been closed or merged add it to the milestone. Have a look at this link to learn more about milestones: https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/tracking-the-progress-of-your-work-with-milestones/about-milestones You are always welcome to reach out and ask any questions **** # Questions [questions:soc] ## Activities [activities:soc] **** ### Mentoring What does it mean to be a mentor? Mentors **check in with a student at least once per week** roughly from May-August, and offer some project management guidance and encouragement... while relying on the [plots-dev list](/wiki/developers) and the `@publiclab/reviewers` group on GitHub to provide code-specific input, so that we share the burden of specific technical support. This means that **to be a mentor you don't necessarily need to know how to code** -- we need mentors who know Public Lab's community and practices well, and who can encourage students to speak up when they get stuck, and to ask the community for input and testing of their work. Students often get stuck when they don't know how something should look, or how a feature might be used by the community -- contextual info! If you're interested in being a mentor, email the developers list or jeff@publiclab.org -- and read over our [software outreach resources](/software-outreach) to get an idea of how we work! Some more resources on mentoring: * our [Summer of Code workflow](https://opensource.googleblog.com/2016/12/google-summer-of-code-2016-wrap-up_21.html) * read [different ways to mentor in this post](/notes/warren/11-08-2016/help-public-lab-s-software-grow-by-joining-a-supportive-team) -- we need various types! * read about [what reviewers do day-to-day on Public Lab code projects](/wiki/developers#Reviewers) * read about [our commitment to modularity](/notes/warren/01-18-2018/software-outreach-modularity-is-great-for-collaboration), very important in how we ask contributors to work * read over our [software outreach strategies](/software-outreach) * http://write.flossmanuals.net/gsoc-mentoring/ also has a lot of resources on mentoring, though not specific to Public Lab **** ### Communication We do occasional chat or video sessions, and mentors rely on each other quite a bit, in [the chatroom](/chat) and [on the plots-gsoc list](/developers). ### Benefits Our code contributor community is built on a commitment to mutual benefit -- we can’t create good software without welcoming in newcomers, and we are deeply invested in supporting contributors to learn new skills and grow as coders, designers, project leaders, and “cooperators”. Unlike many open source communities, much of our capacity is aimed at helping people become proficient coders, and to learn and apply principles such as code modularity, test-driven development, and more, as outlined at https://publiclab.org/software-outreach. But we also seek to change coding culture by recognizing how important communication, mutual support, and affirmative and welcoming tone are. As part of this, we seek to improve ourselves and help contributors learn how to support one another, welcome in a diverse and inclusive community, and build a more positive and equitable society by doing things a little differently. **** ### Past years * 2019: #soc-2019 #outreachy-2019 * 2018: #soc-2018 #outreachy-2018 * Starting in 2017, we began using tags to organize content, such as #soc-2017 * [Call for proposals](/notes/warren/02-28-2017/call-for-proposals) and [wrap-up](/notes/warren/09-07-2017/wrapping-up-google-summer-of-code-2017-at-public-lab) * [GSOC 2016](/wiki/gsoc-2016) program, projects, students and mentors * [GSOC 2015](/wiki/gsoc-2015) program (application only), projects, students and mentors * [GSoC 2014](/wiki/gsoc-2014) program, projects, students and mentors * [GSoC 2013](/wiki/gsoc-2013) program * [GSoC 2013 mentors & proposals](http://publiclab.org/wiki/gsoc-2013-mentors-and-student-proposals) **** ### Updates [notes:soc] ...
Author | Comment | Last activity | Moderation | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
warren | "I echo Dave's thought about ordering, and agree that it means we'd prefer a client-side implementation of both auto-extraction of spectral response..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
warren | "Thank you for this thorough and excellent proposal! " | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
warren | "This is really killer. Thanks Justin. If we get this done along with the other MapKnitter Leaflet proposal, we're going to be adding some amazing n..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
warren | "Couple other notes - curvature correction would be great and pretty consistent for still captures, but would it scale to live-capture... and would ..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
warren | "I see nobody's responded... I have a camera with GPS built in, and will try to take a photo from a high perspective. But you should also email Pat ..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
warren | " how Anish's project will make changes to editor, apart from porting is there any visual level mods that would be made? We've discussed his re-imp..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
warren | "It also occurred to me that you could start by making a page which displays existing maps without allowing users to save any changes to them, or pe..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
warren | "Wow, excellent demo! I'm so glad you posted it. I think the interface will be more complex, but this shows that you're definitely capable of implem..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
mathew | "I think the scope is good-- better to shoot for something doable and get it done-- there is plenty to do even if the technical work is a breeze. if..." | Read more » | almost 11 years ago | |||
Sreyanth | "Hi Dave Sorry. I somehow missed this comment. Yes, You are right with your steps to be taken. And, I think I planned to take the same steps (alon..." | Read more » | almost 11 years ago | |||
justinmanley | "Thanks, mathew! I really enjoyed your roundup of the work that's been done so far on MapKnitter annotations. It reminded me a lot of Edward Tufte..." | Read more » | almost 11 years ago | |||
mathew | "This is a very thorough proposal! thanks for thinking through how these features might work, and investigating the feasibility of integration of fa..." | Read more » | almost 11 years ago | |||
eustatic | "sweet " | Read more » | almost 11 years ago | |||
stoft | "Sreyanth, Jeff, I may not be up on the latest strategy for the code projects, but I'm still sensing that some concepts are diffuse. Performing fre..." | Read more » | almost 11 years ago | |||
Sreyanth | "UPDATED the proposal. Please have a look and let me know if this is Okay! Thanks Sreyanth " | Read more » | almost 11 years ago | |||
mathew | "Liz-- Definitely! Starting annotations BEFORE stitching is a super feature. especially when kite/balloon mapping, I like making records of obstacl..." | Read more » | almost 11 years ago | |||
aduma | "While Gina Wirth's ArcGIS work looks excellent, that software is very expensive. A bit more in line with PublicLab's accessible and open community ..." | Read more » | almost 11 years ago | |||
xvidun | "This looks good. I especially like the idea of adding arrows and pointers. How can we solve the problem of organizing a lot of annotations into a ..." | Read more » | almost 11 years ago | |||
stoft | "Yes, resolution is affected by slit width; though much less than the intensity change which is related to the square area. I'd had some success in ..." | Read more » | almost 11 years ago | |||
cfastie | "Would it work to have a constant width slit with an integrated neutral density gradient from 100% transmission at one end to something less than th..." | Read more » | almost 11 years ago | |||
stoft | "Pascal, Thanks. Hope my posted note on HDR2 is readable. Just a thought on the 'stepped-slit'. I constructed a number of them with the idea of for..." | Read more » | almost 11 years ago | |||
PascalW | "Jeff: I was pretty busy the last few days and have to admit I couldn't follow the discussion on Sreyanth's proposal to closely. But I have a long ..." | Read more » | almost 11 years ago | |||
anishshah101 | "ya sure, you can have a look at the demo at: http://128.199.208.55/ The overlay image might take a few extra seconds to load. " | Read more » | almost 11 years ago | |||
liz | "This would be great! I am also interested in adding map annotations to a mapknitter project BEFORE uploading any imagery. This is useful as a basic..." | Read more » | almost 11 years ago |