@maxliboiron recently made a great post about using BabyLegs- a research trawl (net system) for monitoring plastic pollution, especially microplastics, in surface water. You can reference this page to learn how to build and deploy the BabyLegs trawl and how to process your samples. In the wiki page about microplastics analysis, she mentions the need for a dissecting microscope, which is different than a compound microscope.
Public Lab is curious if the community microscope, which is a compound microscope in its present state, can be converted into a dissecting microscope for this use. I've made a diagram below, illustrating what I believe to be the conversion process. I haven't tried it out myself but I encourage others to do so and let us know how it goes!
Read more about the difference between the compound and dissecting microscope here.
's diagram; I remember at the Nueva School before MakerFaire last year, some of the kids were able to make a low-magnification microscope by not flipping the lens (unlike the [#community-microscope](/tag/community-microscope)) but simply by spacing it further away from the sensor. (you can see a [photo of the workshop here](https://publiclab.org/notes/bronwen/06-29-2018/community-microscope-thank-you) and [an update about it here](https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/publiclab/the-community-microscope-kit/posts/2191026))
Here's a photo of what they did:
[](/i/32622?s=o)
At first I thought I had to remove the lens and place it further away, but after struggling for a while, I realized I could just unscrew it /somewhat/ but not anywhere near all the way.
It worked! Here's a photo of the setup. Like [@jiteovien](/profile/jiteovien) proposed, I just put the camera above, facing down through the hole, rather than looking up through it.
[](/i/32624?s=o)
It took a LOT of light, so we may need to think how we can boost light in a more efficient way than using a ton of gooseneck LED lights. But I think it compares well with photos of microplastics from the [#babylegs](/tag/babylegs) page.
Here's a photo of an SD card with a crude scale bar:
[](/i/32623?s=o)
Compare to Max's photo from the [#babylegs](/tag/babylegs) page:
[@maxliboiron](/profile/maxliboiron), what do you think? It's not very crisp, but in terms of scale, does this work?
If we need a lot more resolution for this to be useful, we can use one of the [nicer cameras from the Plus kit](https://publiclab.org/notes/warren/10-24-2018/add-a-high-quality-webcam-to-your-community-microscope-kit).
){kind=link}
This looks great, and AWESOME diagram! @maxliboiron do you think we have to flip the dissecting scope so that the materials can be on the same side of the slide as the camera, and don't fall off? i.e. the camera looks down at them?
Or do you think we'd be able to focus through the bottom of a glass or plastic slide or container to view them from below?
Thanks!
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 5:09 PM \<notifications@publiclab.org> wrote:
Is this a question? Click here to post it to the Questions page.
Reply to this comment...
Log in to comment