We’re talking about organizing and maps! Join us on Open Call every Tuesday through June. Click here for call-in details!

Public Lab Wiki documentation



sandbox-screen-soil-contamination

1 | 4 | | #26007

The soil testing methods listed on this page use different approaches to screen for contaminants. In general, the data these methods produce are less accurate and precise than certified lab-based methods, but the methods are more accessible in terms of materials, cost, and logistics. Many screening methods are available as kits or portable units that can be used quickly in the field.

Screening for heavy metals and organic compounds

Overviews on Public Lab


Example methods and tools

Hanby Field Test Kit

hanby_houston_barnraising

Image: Learning about the Hanby Field Test Kit at the Houston Barnraising, by @zengirl2

  • Tests for: Organic contaminants (petroleum products, PAHs, PCBs)
  • Advantages: Tests can be done quickly in the field; relatively low cost per sample.
  • Limitations: Can be difficult to compare color if the sample is dark; other petroleum compounds might interfere with color changes and lead to inaccurate results interpretation. See more in this comment by @jjcreedon.

Posts and wikis related to the hanby-soil-kit


Nuestros Suelos: a low-cost toolkit for the participative assessment of soil degradation

nuestros_suelos_toolkit

Image: Soil testing toolkit by @sureta.

  • Tests for: indicators of fertility (organic matter, carbonates, N-P-K, and pH) and presence of heavy metals (copper and arsenic).

Posts and wikis related to nuestros-suelos


Portable X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometer

portable_xrf

Image: Portable XRF in the field. USDA photo by Lance Cheung, CC0

  • Tests for: Metals.
  • Advantages: Tests are relatively non-destructive and can be done quickly in the field with portable or handheld units; high cost to purchase but options to rent units can lower costs relative to testing via lab analytical techniques.
  • Limitations: It might not be sensitive enough to detect metal concentrations that are relatively low but still above regulatory levels for toxicity (from EPA Method 6200 doc).

Posts and wikis related to xrf


Other methods


Measuring effects of contaminants (toxicity)

The screening methods listed above indicate relative or real amounts of a contaminant in a soil sample. But the amount of a contaminant in the soil doesn’t always translate into a predictable effect on living things. To learn about the potential for harmful impacts from contaminated soil, some people complement typical soil testing with tests for toxicity or “effect-based” tests.

lettuce seed bioassay

Image: An example “effect-based test” is a bioassay. This image is of a lettuce seed bioassay showing longer roots in lettuce seeds that sprouted in distilled water (DW) compared to shorter roots in seeds exposed to different concentrations of ethyl acetate, a chemical that negatively affects growth. From Waqas et al. 2013, CC BY

Methods related to effect-based-test will appear here

Title Updated Version Views Likes
Bioassay 20 days ago by alejobonifacio 2 84 2


Questions about soil testing for screening purposes

Questions tagged with question:screen-soil-contamination will appear here

Title Author Updated Likes Comments
Nothing yet on the topic "screen-soil-contamination" -- be the first to post something!

Ask a question  or help answer future questions on this topic


Activities on soil testing for screening purposes

Activities tagged with activity:screen-soil-contamination will appear here

Add an activity  or request an activity guide you don't see listed

Activities should include a materials list, costs and a step-by-step guide to construction with photos. Learn what makes a good activity here.