12
CURRENT
|
warren |
April 19, 2011 03:04
| over 13 years ago
Notes on the actual meeting can be found here
Discussion topics
What happened
- what broke down in our consensus process
- proposals for a revised decision-making process
- discussion of what sorts of decisions must have full consensus
- how we define and determine consensus
- personal/rapport/empathy issues
- civility, respect
- deep breaths
Moving forward
- solutions going forward
- rotating facilitator, monthly?
Urgent
- an actual internal budget
- consensus on FT/PT -- in the absence of having made that decision before
- who wants what, who can do what?
- who would take a FT position if it were available?
- separate: willingness, ability, preference, insistence to work PT or FT
- what, organizationally, should be the review/prerequisite process for accepting a FT "applicant"? a plan of work? Stewart & Shannon did one; we could base on that.
- How we value different types of work
- How we prioritize types of work
General organizational decision making
- rotating topic-based decision making teams to reduce burden
- few teams with broad categories, like: Publishing, Data Outreach, Kits, Tool Research, Evaluation, Communities
- each time has 3 members, each staff member has 2-3 team memberships?
- switch around every 3 months?
8:30 eastern, 7:30c/5:30p
|
Revert |
|
11
|
mathew |
April 19, 2011 00:22
| over 13 years ago
Discussion topics
What happened
- what broke down in our consensus process
- proposals for a revised decision-making process
- discussion of what sorts of decisions must have full consensus
- how we define and determine consensus
- personal/rapport/empathy issues
- civility, respect
- deep breaths
Moving forward
- solutions going forward
- rotating facilitator, monthly?
Urgent
- an actual internal budget
- consensus on FT/PT -- in the absence of having made that decision before
- who wants what, who can do what?
- who would take a FT position if it were available?
- separate: willingness, ability, preference, insistence to work PT or FT
- what, organizationally, should be the review/prerequisite process for accepting a FT "applicant"? a plan of work? Stewart & Shannon did one; we could base on that.
- How we value different types of work
- How we prioritize types of work
General organizational decision making
- rotating topic-based decision making teams to reduce burden
- few teams with broad categories, like: Publishing, Data Outreach, Kits, Tool Research, Evaluation, Communities
- each time has 3 members, each staff member has 2-3 team memberships?
- switch around every 3 months?
8:30 eastern, 7:30c/5:30p
|
Revert |
|
10
|
mathew |
April 19, 2011 00:21
| over 13 years ago
Discussion topics
Urgent
// we can't discuss this until we've discussed our decision making process, skip to i.e. "what happened" -Mathew
- an actual internal budget
- consensus on FT/PT -- in the absence of having made that decision before
- who wants what, who can do what?
- who would take a FT position if it were available?
- separate: willingness, ability, preference, insistence to work PT or FT
- what, organizationally, should be the review/prerequisite process for accepting a FT "applicant"? a plan of work? Stewart & Shannon did one; we could base on that.
- How we value different types of work
- How we prioritize types of work
What happened
- what broke down in our consensus process
- proposals for a revised decision-making process
- discussion of what sorts of decisions must have full consensus
- how we define and determine consensus
- personal/rapport/empathy issues
- civility, respect
- deep breaths
Moving forward
- solutions going forward
- rotating facilitator, monthly?
General organizational decision making
- rotating topic-based decision making teams to reduce burden
- few teams with broad categories, like: Publishing, Data Outreach, Kits, Tool Research, Evaluation, Communities
- each time has 3 members, each staff member has 2-3 team memberships?
- switch around every 3 months?
8:30 eastern, 7:30c/5:30p
|
Revert |
|
9
|
gonzoearth |
April 18, 2011 23:34
| over 13 years ago
Discussion topics
Urgent
- an actual internal budget
- consensus on FT/PT -- in the absence of having made that decision before
- who wants what, who can do what?
- who would take a FT position if it were available?
- separate: willingness, ability, preference, insistence to work PT or FT
- what, organizationally, should be the review/prerequisite process for accepting a FT "applicant"? a plan of work? Stewart & Shannon did one; we could base on that.
- How we value different types of work
- How we prioritize types of work
What happened
- what broke down in our consensus process
- proposals for a revised decision-making process
- discussion of what sorts of decisions must have full consensus
- how we define and determine consensus
- personal/rapport/empathy issues
- civility, respect
- deep breaths
Moving forward
- solutions going forward
- rotating facilitator, monthly?
General organizational decision making
- rotating topic-based decision making teams to reduce burden
- few teams with broad categories, like: Publishing, Data Outreach, Kits, Tool Research, Evaluation, Communities
- each time has 3 members, each staff member has 2-3 team memberships?
- switch around every 3 months?
8:30 eastern, 7:30c/5:30p
|
Revert |
|
8
|
Shannon |
April 18, 2011 22:13
| over 13 years ago
Discussion topics
Urgent
- an actual internal budget
- consensus on FT/PT -- in the absence of having made that decision before
- who wants what, who can do what?
- who would take a FT position if it were available?
- separate: willingness, ability, preference, insistence to work PT or FT
- what, organizationally, should be the review/prerequisite process for accepting a FT "applicant"? a plan of work? Stewart & Shannon did one; we could base on that.
- How we value different types of work
What happened
- what broke down in our consensus process
- proposals for a revised decision-making process
- discussion of what sorts of decisions must have full consensus
- how we define and determine consensus
- personal/rapport/empathy issues
- civility, respect
- deep breaths
Moving forward
- solutions going forward
- rotating facilitator, monthly?
General organizational decision making
- rotating topic-based decision making teams to reduce burden
- few teams with broad categories, like: Publishing, Data Outreach, Kits, Tool Research, Evaluation, Communities
- each time has 3 members, each staff member has 2-3 team memberships?
- switch around every 3 months?
8:30 eastern, 7:30c/5:30p
|
Revert |
|
7
|
warren |
April 15, 2011 21:08
| over 13 years ago
Discussion topics
Urgent
- an actual internal budget
- consensus on FT/PT -- in the absence of having made that decision before
- who wants what, who can do what?
- who would take a FT position if it were available?
- separate: willingness, ability, preference, insistence to work PT or FT
- what, organizationally, should be the review/prerequisite process for accepting a FT "applicant"? a plan of work? Stewart & Shannon did one; we could base on that.
What happened
- what broke down in our consensus process
- proposals for a revised decision-making process
- discussion of what sorts of decisions must have full consensus
- how we define and determine consensus
- personal/rapport/empathy issues
- civility, respect
- deep breaths
Moving forward
- solutions going forward
- rotating facilitator, monthly?
General organizational decision making
- rotating topic-based decision making teams to reduce burden
- few teams with broad categories, like: Publishing, Data Outreach, Kits, Tool Research, Evaluation, Communities
- each time has 3 members, each staff member has 2-3 team memberships?
- switch around every 3 months?
8:30 eastern, 7:30c/5:30p
|
Revert |
|
6
|
warren |
April 15, 2011 21:08
| over 13 years ago
Discussion topics
Urgent
- an actual internal budget
- consensus on FT/PT -- in the absence of having made that decision before
- who wants what, who can do what?
- who would take a FT position if it were available?
- separate: willingness, ability, preference, insistence to work PT or FT
- what, organizationally, should be the review/prerequisite process for accepting a FT "applicant"? a plan of work? Stewart & Shannon did one; we could base on that.
Moving forward
- what broke down in our consensus process
- proposals for a revised decision-making process
- discussion of what sorts of decisions must have full consensus
- how we define and determine consensus
- personal/rapport/empathy issues
- civility, respect
- deep breaths
Moving forward
- solutions going forward
- rotating facilitator, monthly?
General organizational decision making
- rotating topic-based decision making teams to reduce burden
- few teams with broad categories, like: Publishing, Data Outreach, Kits, Tool Research, Evaluation, Communities
- each time has 3 members, each staff member has 2-3 team memberships?
- switch around every 3 months?
8:30 eastern, 7:30c/5:30p
|
Revert |
|
5
|
warren |
April 15, 2011 16:39
| over 13 years ago
Discussion topics
- an "actual" internal budget
- what broke down in our consensus process
- proposals for a revised decision-making process
- discussion of what sorts of decisions must have full consensus
- how we define and determine consensus
- personal/rapport/empathy issues
- civility, respect
- deep breaths
- solutions going forward
- consensus on FT/PT -- in the absence of having made that decision before
- who wants what, who can do what?
- who would take a FT position if it were available?
- what, organizationally, should be the review/prerequisite process for accepting a FT "applicant"? a plan of work? Stewart & Shannon did one; we could base on that.
8:30 eastern, 7:30c/5:30p
|
Revert |
|
4
|
warren |
April 15, 2011 15:53
| over 13 years ago
Discussion topics
- an "actual" internal budget
- what broke down in our consensus process
- proposals for a revised decision-making process
- discussion of what sorts of decisions must have full consensus
- how we define and determine consensus
- personal/rapport/empathy issues
- civility, respect
- deep breaths
- solutions going forward
- consensus on FT/PT -- in the absence of having made that decision before -- who wants what, who can do what?
8:30 eastern, 7:30c/5:30p
|
Revert |
|
3
|
mathew |
April 15, 2011 15:51
| over 13 years ago
Discussion topics
- an "actual" internal budget
- what broke down in our consensus process
- proposals for a revised decision-making process
- discussion of what sorts of decisions must have full consensus
- how we define and determine consensus
- personal/rapport/empathy issues
- civility, respect
- deep breaths
- solutions going forward
8:30 eastern, 7:30c/5:30p
|
Revert |
|
2
|
Shannon |
April 15, 2011 15:34
| over 13 years ago
Discussion topics
- an "actual" internal budget
- what broke down in our consensus process
- proposals for a revised decision-making process
- discussion of what sorts of decisions must have full consensus
- how we define and determine consensus
- personal/rapport/empathy issues
- civility, respect
- deep breaths
- solutions going forward
|
Revert |
|
1
|
warren |
April 15, 2011 15:20
| over 13 years ago
Discussion topics
- an "actual" internal budget
- what broke down in our consensus process
- proposals for a revised decision-making process
- discussion of what sorts of decisions must have full consensus
- how we define and determine consensus
- personal/rapport/empathy issues
- civility, respect
- deep breaths
|
Revert |
|
0
|
warren |
April 15, 2011 15:19
| over 13 years ago
Discussion topics
- an "actual" internal budget
- what broke down in our consensus process
- proposals for a revised decision-making process
- discussion of what sorts of decisions must have full consensus
- how we define and determine consensus
- personal/rapport/empathy issues - civility, respect
|
Revert |
|