Revisions for Evaluation
| 56 | liz |
May 10, 2018 19:46
| over 6 years ago
Welcome! This is the home for all things related to evaluation at Public Lab. Many different feedback efforts are ongoing in different sectors and we try to coordinate our efforts to minimize survey fatigue or redundancy. @liz leads the evaluation team! Ask questions below to find out more. Follow along with current workSee all recent work tagged evaluation here, or click on the boards below to see progress on: 1) our Snapshot Evaluation and Evaluation Framework (May 2015-May 2018) generously supported by the Rita Allen Foundation Trello Board Trello Board Trello Board Here's a link to the staff board for developing year-round evaluation tasks, being integrated into the third Trello board above: https://app.asana.com/0/645629000328698/board What are we measuring against?All evaluation is tracked against our Logic Model, and our Logic Model is based on our Community Glossary. Community SurveysOur Annual Community Survey is delivered over email lists and posted on the website.
Stakeholder interviewingA series of stakeholder interviews was done in 2017! You can read them here: [notes:series:community-interviews] Online analyticsThe ever-growing Data Dictionary describes the datasets that are available for analysis. Created by @bsugar, maintained by @bsugar and @liz. TopicsConversational dynamics on mailing lists:
User interface designSee the User Interface page for more on design work towards user interface and user interaction improvements. This is an area where many people are offering feedback! Questions[questions:evaluation] Related work[notes:evaluation] Older page contentFrom 2014 via @liz: brainstorming possible community metrics From 2011 via @warren, interesting! Read on: On this page we are in the process of summarizing and formulating our approach towards self-evaluation; as a community with strong principles, where we engage in open participation and advocacy in our partner communities, this process is not that of a typical researcher/participant nature. Rather, we seek to formulate an evaluative approach that takes into account:
GoalsGood evaluative approaches could enable us to:
ApproachesWe're going to use a few different approaches in performing (self-)evaluation -- each has pros and cons, but we will attempt to meet the above goals in structuring them. Approach A: Logbook questionnaireThe logbook is an idea for a Lulu.com printed book to bring on field mapping missions for balloon mapping. Although this strategy can be reductive, compared to interviews, videos, etc, its standard approach yields data which we can graph, analyze and publish for public use. The results will be published here periodically. Any member of our community may use them for fundraising, outreach, or for example to print & carry to the beach to improve mapping technique. Read more at the Logbook page. A mini version of this questionnaire was used by Jen Hudon as part of her Grassroots Newark project and can be found here: Approach B: Community BlogThe community blog represents a way for members of our community to ... critical as well as positive... To contribute to the community blog, visit the Community Blog page Approach C: InterviewsWe're beginning a series of journalistic/narrative interviews with residents of the communities we work with. Read more at the interviews page. |
Revert | |
| 55 | liz |
May 10, 2018 19:45
| over 6 years ago
Welcome! This is the home for all things related to evaluation at Public Lab. Many different feedback efforts are ongoing in different sectors and we try to coordinate our efforts to minimize survey fatigue or redundancy. @liz leads the evaluation team! Ask questions below to find out more. Follow along with current workClick on the boards below to see progress on: 1) our Snapshot Evaluation and Evaluation Framework (May 2015-May 2018) generously supported by the Rita Allen Foundation Trello Board Trello Board Trello Board Here's a link to the staff board for developing year-round evaluation tasks, being integrated into the third Trello board above: https://app.asana.com/0/645629000328698/board What are we measuring against?All evaluation is tracked against our Logic Model, and our Logic Model is based on our Community Glossary. Community SurveysOur Annual Community Survey is delivered over email lists and posted on the website.
Stakeholder interviewingA series of stakeholder interviews was done in 2017! You can read them here: [notes:series:community-interviews] Online analyticsThe ever-growing Data Dictionary describes the datasets that are available for analysis. Created by @bsugar, maintained by @bsugar and @liz. TopicsConversational dynamics on mailing lists:
User interface designSee the User Interface page for more on design work towards user interface and user interaction improvements. This is an area where many people are offering feedback! Questions[questions:evaluation] Related work[notes:evaluation] Older page contentFrom 2014 via @liz: brainstorming possible community metrics From 2011 via @warren, interesting! Read on: On this page we are in the process of summarizing and formulating our approach towards self-evaluation; as a community with strong principles, where we engage in open participation and advocacy in our partner communities, this process is not that of a typical researcher/participant nature. Rather, we seek to formulate an evaluative approach that takes into account:
GoalsGood evaluative approaches could enable us to:
ApproachesWe're going to use a few different approaches in performing (self-)evaluation -- each has pros and cons, but we will attempt to meet the above goals in structuring them. Approach A: Logbook questionnaireThe logbook is an idea for a Lulu.com printed book to bring on field mapping missions for balloon mapping. Although this strategy can be reductive, compared to interviews, videos, etc, its standard approach yields data which we can graph, analyze and publish for public use. The results will be published here periodically. Any member of our community may use them for fundraising, outreach, or for example to print & carry to the beach to improve mapping technique. Read more at the Logbook page. A mini version of this questionnaire was used by Jen Hudon as part of her Grassroots Newark project and can be found here: Approach B: Community BlogThe community blog represents a way for members of our community to ... critical as well as positive... To contribute to the community blog, visit the Community Blog page Approach C: InterviewsWe're beginning a series of journalistic/narrative interviews with residents of the communities we work with. Read more at the interviews page. |
Revert | |
| 54 | liz |
May 10, 2018 19:44
| over 6 years ago
Welcome! This is the home for all things related to evaluation at Public Lab. Many different feedback efforts are ongoing in different sectors and we try to coordinate our efforts to minimize survey fatigue or redundancy. @liz leads the evaluation team! Ask questions below to find out more. Follow along with current workClick on the boards below to see progress on: 1) our Snapshot Evaluation and Evaluation Framework (May 2015-May 2018) generously supported by the Rita Allen Foundation Trello Board Trello Board Trello Board Here's a link to the staff board for developing year-round evaluation tasks, being integrated into the third Trello board above: https://app.asana.com/0/645629000328698/board BasicsAll evaluation is tracked against our Logic Model, and our Logic Model is based on our Community Glossary. Community SurveysOur Annual Community Survey is delivered over email lists and posted on the website.
Stakeholder interviewingA series of stakeholder interviews was done in 2017! You can read them here: [notes:series:community-interviews] Online analyticsThe ever-growing Data Dictionary describes the datasets that are available for analysis. Created by @bsugar, maintained by @bsugar and @liz. TopicsConversational dynamics on mailing lists:
User interface designSee the User Interface page for more on design work towards user interface and user interaction improvements. This is an area where many people are offering feedback! Questions[questions:evaluation] Related work[notes:evaluation] Older page contentFrom 2014 via @liz: brainstorming possible community metrics From 2011 via @warren, interesting! Read on: On this page we are in the process of summarizing and formulating our approach towards self-evaluation; as a community with strong principles, where we engage in open participation and advocacy in our partner communities, this process is not that of a typical researcher/participant nature. Rather, we seek to formulate an evaluative approach that takes into account:
GoalsGood evaluative approaches could enable us to:
ApproachesWe're going to use a few different approaches in performing (self-)evaluation -- each has pros and cons, but we will attempt to meet the above goals in structuring them. Approach A: Logbook questionnaireThe logbook is an idea for a Lulu.com printed book to bring on field mapping missions for balloon mapping. Although this strategy can be reductive, compared to interviews, videos, etc, its standard approach yields data which we can graph, analyze and publish for public use. The results will be published here periodically. Any member of our community may use them for fundraising, outreach, or for example to print & carry to the beach to improve mapping technique. Read more at the Logbook page. A mini version of this questionnaire was used by Jen Hudon as part of her Grassroots Newark project and can be found here: Approach B: Community BlogThe community blog represents a way for members of our community to ... critical as well as positive... To contribute to the community blog, visit the Community Blog page Approach C: InterviewsWe're beginning a series of journalistic/narrative interviews with residents of the communities we work with. Read more at the interviews page. |
Revert | |
| 53 | liz |
May 10, 2018 17:59
| over 6 years ago
Welcome! This is the home for all things related to evaluation at Public Lab. Many different feedback efforts are ongoing in different sectors and we try to coordinate our efforts to minimize survey fatigue or redundancy. @liz leads the evaluation team! Ask questions below to find out more. Follow along with current workClick on the boards below to see progress on: 1) our Snapshot Evaluation and Evaluation Framework (May 2015-May 2018) generously supported by the Rita Allen Foundation Trello Board Trello Board Trello Board Here's a link to the staff board for developing year-round evaluation tasks, being integrated into the third Trello board above: https://app.asana.com/0/645629000328698/board Community SurveysOur Annual Community Survey is delivered over email lists and posted on the website.
Stakeholder interviewingA series of stakeholder interviews was done in 2017! You can read them here: [notes:series:community-interviews] Online analyticsThe ever-growing Data Dictionary describes the datasets that are available for analysis. Created by @bsugar, maintained by @bsugar and @liz. TopicsConversational dynamics on mailing lists:
User interface designSee the User Interface page for more on design work towards user interface and user interaction improvements. This is an area where many people are offering feedback! Questions[questions:evaluation] Related work[notes:evaluation] Older page contentFrom 2014 via @liz: brainstorming possible community metrics From 2011 via @warren, interesting! Read on: On this page we are in the process of summarizing and formulating our approach towards self-evaluation; as a community with strong principles, where we engage in open participation and advocacy in our partner communities, this process is not that of a typical researcher/participant nature. Rather, we seek to formulate an evaluative approach that takes into account:
GoalsGood evaluative approaches could enable us to:
ApproachesWe're going to use a few different approaches in performing (self-)evaluation -- each has pros and cons, but we will attempt to meet the above goals in structuring them. Approach A: Logbook questionnaireThe logbook is an idea for a Lulu.com printed book to bring on field mapping missions for balloon mapping. Although this strategy can be reductive, compared to interviews, videos, etc, its standard approach yields data which we can graph, analyze and publish for public use. The results will be published here periodically. Any member of our community may use them for fundraising, outreach, or for example to print & carry to the beach to improve mapping technique. Read more at the Logbook page. A mini version of this questionnaire was used by Jen Hudon as part of her Grassroots Newark project and can be found here: Approach B: Community BlogThe community blog represents a way for members of our community to ... critical as well as positive... To contribute to the community blog, visit the Community Blog page Approach C: InterviewsWe're beginning a series of journalistic/narrative interviews with residents of the communities we work with. Read more at the interviews page. |
Revert | |
| 52 | liz |
May 10, 2018 17:43
| over 6 years ago
Welcome! This is the home for all things related to evaluation at Public Lab. Many different feedback efforts are ongoing in different sectors and we try to coordinate our efforts to minimize survey fatigue or redundancy. @liz leads the evaluation team! Ask questions below to find out more. Follow along with current workClick on the boards below to see progress on: 1) our Snapshot Evaluation and Evaluation Framework (May 2015-May 2018) generously supported by the Rita Allen Foundation Trello Board Trello Board Trello Board Here's a link to the staff board for developing year-round evaluation tasks, being integrated into the third Trello board above: https://app.asana.com/0/645629000328698/board Community SurveysOur Annual Community Survey is delivered over email lists and posted on the website.
Stakeholder interviewingA series of stakeholder interviews was done in 2017! You can read them here: [notes:series:community-interviews] Online analyticsThe ever-growing Data Dictionary describes the datasets that are available for analysis. Created by @bsugar, maintained by @bsugar and @liz. TopicsConversational dynamics on mailing lists:
User interface designSee the User Interface page for more on design work towards user interface and user interaction improvements. This is an area where many people are offering feedback! Questions[questions:evaluation] Related work[notes:evaluation] Older page content(From 2011 via @warren, interesting!) On this page we are in the process of summarizing and formulating our approach towards self-evaluation; as a community with strong principles, where we engage in open participation and advocacy in our partner communities, this process is not that of a typical researcher/participant nature. Rather, we seek to formulate an evaluative approach that takes into account:
GoalsGood evaluative approaches could enable us to:
ApproachesWe're going to use a few different approaches in performing (self-)evaluation -- each has pros and cons, but we will attempt to meet the above goals in structuring them. Approach A: Logbook questionnaireThe logbook is an idea for a Lulu.com printed book to bring on field mapping missions for balloon mapping. Although this strategy can be reductive, compared to interviews, videos, etc, its standard approach yields data which we can graph, analyze and publish for public use. The results will be published here periodically. Any member of our community may use them for fundraising, outreach, or for example to print & carry to the beach to improve mapping technique. Read more at the Logbook page. A mini version of this questionnaire was used by Jen Hudon as part of her Grassroots Newark project and can be found here: Approach B: Community BlogThe community blog represents a way for members of our community to ... critical as well as positive... To contribute to the community blog, visit the Community Blog page Approach C: InterviewsWe're beginning a series of journalistic/narrative interviews with residents of the communities we work with. Read more at the interviews page. |
Revert | |
| 51 | liz |
May 10, 2018 16:10
| over 6 years ago
Welcome! This is the home for all things related to evaluation at Public Lab. Many different feedback efforts are ongoing in different sectors and we try to coordinate our efforts to minimize survey fatigue or redundancy. @liz leads the evaluation team! Ask questions below to find out more. Follow along with current workClick on the boards below to see progress on: 1) our Snapshot Evaluation and Evaluation Framework (May 2015-May 2018) generously supported by the Rita Allen Foundation Trello Board Trello Board Trello Board Here's a link to the staff board for developing year-round evaluation tasks, being integrated into the third Trello board above: https://app.asana.com/0/645629000328698/board Community SurveysOur Annual Community Survey is delivered over email lists and posted on the website.
Stakeholder interviewingA series of stakeholder interviews was done in 2017! You can read them here: [notes:series:community-interviews] Online analyticsThe ever-growing Data Dictionary describes the datasets that are available for analysis. Created by @bsugar, maintained by @bsugar and @liz. User interface designSee the User Interface page for more on design work towards user interface and user interaction improvements. This is an area where many people are offering feedback! Questions[questions:evaluation] Related work[notes:evaluation] Older page content(From 2011 via @warren, interesting!) On this page we are in the process of summarizing and formulating our approach towards self-evaluation; as a community with strong principles, where we engage in open participation and advocacy in our partner communities, this process is not that of a typical researcher/participant nature. Rather, we seek to formulate an evaluative approach that takes into account:
GoalsGood evaluative approaches could enable us to:
ApproachesWe're going to use a few different approaches in performing (self-)evaluation -- each has pros and cons, but we will attempt to meet the above goals in structuring them. Approach A: Logbook questionnaireThe logbook is an idea for a Lulu.com printed book to bring on field mapping missions for balloon mapping. Although this strategy can be reductive, compared to interviews, videos, etc, its standard approach yields data which we can graph, analyze and publish for public use. The results will be published here periodically. Any member of our community may use them for fundraising, outreach, or for example to print & carry to the beach to improve mapping technique. Read more at the Logbook page. A mini version of this questionnaire was used by Jen Hudon as part of her Grassroots Newark project and can be found here: Approach B: Community BlogThe community blog represents a way for members of our community to ... critical as well as positive... To contribute to the community blog, visit the Community Blog page Approach C: InterviewsWe're beginning a series of journalistic/narrative interviews with residents of the communities we work with. Read more at the interviews page. |
Revert | |
| 50 | liz |
May 10, 2018 16:08
| over 6 years ago
Welcome! This is the home for all things related to evaluation at Public Lab. Many different feedback efforts are ongoing in different sectors and we try to coordinate our efforts to minimize survey fatigue or redundancy. @liz leads the evaluation team! Ask questions below to find out more. Follow along with current workClick on the boards below to see progress on: 1) our Snapshot Evaluation and Evaluation Framework (May 2015-May 2018) generously supported by the Rita Allen Foundation Trello Board Trello Board Trello Board Here's a link to the staff board for developing year-round evaluation tasks, being integrated into the third Trello board above: https://app.asana.com/0/645629000328698/board Community Surveys
Stakeholder interviewingA series of stakeholder interviews was done in 2017! You can read them here: [notes:series:community-interviews] Online analyticsThe ever-growing Data Dictionary describes the datasets that are available for analysis. Created by @bsugar, maintained by @bsugar and @liz. User interface designSee the User Interface page for more on design work towards user interface and user interaction improvements. This is an area where many people are offering feedback! Questions[questions:evaluation] Related work[notes:evaluation] Older page content(From 2011 via @warren, interesting!) On this page we are in the process of summarizing and formulating our approach towards self-evaluation; as a community with strong principles, where we engage in open participation and advocacy in our partner communities, this process is not that of a typical researcher/participant nature. Rather, we seek to formulate an evaluative approach that takes into account:
GoalsGood evaluative approaches could enable us to:
ApproachesWe're going to use a few different approaches in performing (self-)evaluation -- each has pros and cons, but we will attempt to meet the above goals in structuring them. Approach A: Logbook questionnaireThe logbook is an idea for a Lulu.com printed book to bring on field mapping missions for balloon mapping. Although this strategy can be reductive, compared to interviews, videos, etc, its standard approach yields data which we can graph, analyze and publish for public use. The results will be published here periodically. Any member of our community may use them for fundraising, outreach, or for example to print & carry to the beach to improve mapping technique. Read more at the Logbook page. A mini version of this questionnaire was used by Jen Hudon as part of her Grassroots Newark project and can be found here: Approach B: Community BlogThe community blog represents a way for members of our community to ... critical as well as positive... To contribute to the community blog, visit the Community Blog page Approach C: InterviewsWe're beginning a series of journalistic/narrative interviews with residents of the communities we work with. Read more at the interviews page. |
Revert | |
| 49 | liz |
May 10, 2018 16:00
| over 6 years ago
Welcome! This is the home for all things related to evaluation at Public Lab. Many different feedback efforts are ongoing in different sectors and we try to coordinate our efforts to minimize survey fatigue or redundancy. @liz leads the evaluation team! Ask questions below to find out more. Follow along with current workClick on the boards below to see progress on: 1) our Snapshot Evaluation and Evaluation Framework (May 2015-May 2018) generously supported by the Rita Allen Foundation Trello Board Trello Board Trello Board Here's a link to the staff board for developing year-round evaluation tasks, being integrated into the third Trello board above: https://app.asana.com/0/645629000328698/board Community Surveys
Stakeholder interviewingA series of stakeholder interviews was done in 2017! You can read them here: [notes:series:community-interviews] Online analyticsThe ever-growing Data Dictionary describes the datasets that are available for analysis. Created by @bsugar, maintained by @bsugar and @liz. User interface designSee the User Interface page for more on design work towards user interface and user interaction improvements. This is an area where many people are offering feedback! Questions[questions:evaluation] Related work[notes:evaluation] Older page content(From 2011 via @warren, interesting!) On this page we are in the process of summarizing and formulating our approach towards self-evaluation; as a community with strong principles, where we engage in open participation and advocacy in our partner communities, this process is not that of a typical researcher/participant nature. Rather, we seek to formulate an evaluative approach that takes into account:
GoalsGood evaluative approaches could enable us to:
ApproachesWe're going to use a few different approaches in performing (self-)evaluation -- each has pros and cons, but we will attempt to meet the above goals in structuring them. Approach A: Logbook questionnaireThe logbook is an idea for a Lulu.com printed book to bring on field mapping missions for balloon mapping. Although this strategy can be reductive, compared to interviews, videos, etc, its standard approach yields data which we can graph, analyze and publish for public use. The results will be published here periodically. Any member of our community may use them for fundraising, outreach, or for example to print & carry to the beach to improve mapping technique. Read more at the Logbook page. A mini version of this questionnaire was used by Jen Hudon as part of her Grassroots Newark project and can be found here: Approach B: Community BlogThe community blog represents a way for members of our community to ... critical as well as positive... To contribute to the community blog, visit the Community Blog page Approach C: InterviewsWe're beginning a series of journalistic/narrative interviews with residents of the communities we work with. Read more at the interviews page. |
Revert | |
| 48 | liz |
May 10, 2018 15:59
| over 6 years ago
Welcome! This is the home for all things related to evaluation at Public Lab. Many different feedback efforts are ongoing in different sectors and we try to coordinate our efforts to minimize survey fatigue or redundancy. @liz leads the evaluation team! Ask questions below to find out more. Follow along with current workClick on the boards below to see progress on: 1) our Snapshot Evaluation and Evaluation Framework (May 2015-May 2018) generously supported by the Rita Allen Foundation Trello Board Trello Board Trello Board Here's a link to the staff board for developing year-round evaluation tasks, being integrated into the third Trello board above: https://app.asana.com/0/645629000328698/board Community Surveys
Stakeholder interviewingA series of stakeholder interviews was done in 2017! You can read them here: [notes:series:community-interviews] Online analyticsThe ever-growing Data Dictionary describes the datasets that are available for analysis. Created by @bsugar, maintained by @bsugar and @liz. User interface designSee the User Interface page for more on design work towards user interface and user interaction improvements. This is an area where many people are offering feedback! Questions[questions:evaluation] Related work[notes:evaluation] Older page content(From 2011 via @warren, interesting!) On this page we are in the process of summarizing and formulating our approach towards self-evaluation; as a community with strong principles, where we engage in open participation and advocacy in our partner communities, this process is not that of a typical researcher/participant nature. Rather, we seek to formulate an evaluative approach that takes into account:
GoalsGood evaluative approaches could enable us to:
ApproachesWe're going to use a few different approaches in performing (self-)evaluation -- each has pros and cons, but we will attempt to meet the above goals in structuring them. Approach A: Logbook questionnaireThe logbook is an idea for a Lulu.com printed book to bring on field mapping missions for balloon mapping. Although this strategy can be reductive, compared to interviews, videos, etc, its standard approach yields data which we can graph, analyze and publish for public use. The results will be published here periodically. Any member of our community may use them for fundraising, outreach, or for example to print & carry to the beach to improve mapping technique. Read more at the Logbook page. A mini version of this questionnaire was used by Jen Hudon as part of her Grassroots Newark project and can be found here: Approach B: Community BlogThe community blog represents a way for members of our community to ... critical as well as positive... To contribute to the community blog, visit the Community Blog page Approach C: InterviewsWe're beginning a series of journalistic/narrative interviews with residents of the communities we work with. Read more at the interviews page. |
Revert | |
| 47 | liz |
May 10, 2018 15:38
| over 6 years ago
Welcome! This is the home for all things related to evaluation at Public Lab. Many different feedback efforts are ongoing in different sectors and we try to coordinate our efforts to minimize survey fatigue or redundancy. @liz leads the evaluation team! Ask questions below to find out more. Follow along with current workClick on the boards below to see progress on: 1) our Snapshot Evaluation and Evaluation Framework (May 2015-May 2018) generously supported by the Rita Allen Foundation Trello Board Trello Board Trello Board Here's a link to the staff board for developing year-round evaluation tasks, being integrated into the third Trello board above: https://app.asana.com/0/645629000328698/board Community SurveyWe do an annual community-wide survey to better understand our community: Stakeholder interviewingA series of stakeholder interviews was done in 2017! You can read them here: [notes:series:community-interviews] Online analyticsThe ever-growing Data Dictionary describes the datasets that are available for analysis. Created by @bsugar, maintained by @bsugar and @liz. User interface designSee the User Interface page for more on design work towards user interface and user interaction improvements. This is an area where many people are offering feedback! Questions[questions:evaluation] Related work[notes:evaluation] Older page content(From 2011 via @warren, interesting!) On this page we are in the process of summarizing and formulating our approach towards self-evaluation; as a community with strong principles, where we engage in open participation and advocacy in our partner communities, this process is not that of a typical researcher/participant nature. Rather, we seek to formulate an evaluative approach that takes into account:
GoalsGood evaluative approaches could enable us to:
ApproachesWe're going to use a few different approaches in performing (self-)evaluation -- each has pros and cons, but we will attempt to meet the above goals in structuring them. Approach A: Logbook questionnaireThe logbook is an idea for a Lulu.com printed book to bring on field mapping missions for balloon mapping. Although this strategy can be reductive, compared to interviews, videos, etc, its standard approach yields data which we can graph, analyze and publish for public use. The results will be published here periodically. Any member of our community may use them for fundraising, outreach, or for example to print & carry to the beach to improve mapping technique. Read more at the Logbook page. A mini version of this questionnaire was used by Jen Hudon as part of her Grassroots Newark project and can be found here: Approach B: Community BlogThe community blog represents a way for members of our community to ... critical as well as positive... To contribute to the community blog, visit the Community Blog page Approach C: InterviewsWe're beginning a series of journalistic/narrative interviews with residents of the communities we work with. Read more at the interviews page. |
Revert | |
| 46 | liz |
May 09, 2018 15:11
| over 6 years ago
Welcome! This is the home for all things related to evaluation at Public Lab. Many different feedback efforts are ongoing in different sectors and we try to coordinate our efforts to minimize survey fatigue or redundancy. @liz leads the evaluation team! Ask questions below to find out more. Follow along with current workClick on the boards below to see progress on: 1) our Snapshot Evaluation and Evaluation Framework (May 2015-May 2018) generously supported by the Rita Allen Foundation Trello Board Trello Board Trello Board Here's a link to the staff board for developing year-round evaluation tasks, being integrated into the third Trello board above: https://app.asana.com/0/645629000328698/board Community SurveyWe do an annual community-wide survey to better understand our community: Stakeholder interviewingA series of stakeholder interviews was done in 2017! You can read them here: [notes:series:community-interviews] User interface designSee the User Interface page for more on design work towards user interface and user interaction improvements. This is an area where many people are offering feedback! Questions[questions:evaluation] Related work[notes:evaluation] Older page content(From 2011 via @warren, interesting!) On this page we are in the process of summarizing and formulating our approach towards self-evaluation; as a community with strong principles, where we engage in open participation and advocacy in our partner communities, this process is not that of a typical researcher/participant nature. Rather, we seek to formulate an evaluative approach that takes into account:
GoalsGood evaluative approaches could enable us to:
ApproachesWe're going to use a few different approaches in performing (self-)evaluation -- each has pros and cons, but we will attempt to meet the above goals in structuring them. Approach A: Logbook questionnaireThe logbook is an idea for a Lulu.com printed book to bring on field mapping missions for balloon mapping. Although this strategy can be reductive, compared to interviews, videos, etc, its standard approach yields data which we can graph, analyze and publish for public use. The results will be published here periodically. Any member of our community may use them for fundraising, outreach, or for example to print & carry to the beach to improve mapping technique. Read more at the Logbook page. A mini version of this questionnaire was used by Jen Hudon as part of her Grassroots Newark project and can be found here: Approach B: Community BlogThe community blog represents a way for members of our community to ... critical as well as positive... To contribute to the community blog, visit the Community Blog page Approach C: InterviewsWe're beginning a series of journalistic/narrative interviews with residents of the communities we work with. Read more at the interviews page. |
Revert | |
| 45 | liz |
May 09, 2018 15:10
| over 6 years ago
Welcome! This is the home for all things related to evaluation at Public Lab. Many different feedback efforts are ongoing in different sectors and we try to coordinate our efforts to minimize survey fatigue or redundancy. @liz leads the evaluation team! Ask questions below to find out more. Follow along with current workClick on the Trello boards below to see progress on: 1) our Snapshot Evaluation and Evaluation Framework (May 2015-May 2018) generously supported by the Rita Allen Foundation Trello Board Trello Board Trello Board Here's a link to the staff board for developing year-round evaluation tasks, being integrated into the third Trello board above: https://app.asana.com/0/645629000328698/board Community SurveyWe do an annual community-wide survey to better understand our community: Stakeholder interviewingA series of stakeholder interviews was done in 2017! You can read them here: [notes:series:community-interviews] User interface designSee the User Interface page for more on design work towards user interface and user interaction improvements. This is an area where many people are offering feedback! Questions[questions:evaluation] Related work[notes:evaluation] Older page content(From 2011 via @warren, interesting!) On this page we are in the process of summarizing and formulating our approach towards self-evaluation; as a community with strong principles, where we engage in open participation and advocacy in our partner communities, this process is not that of a typical researcher/participant nature. Rather, we seek to formulate an evaluative approach that takes into account:
GoalsGood evaluative approaches could enable us to:
ApproachesWe're going to use a few different approaches in performing (self-)evaluation -- each has pros and cons, but we will attempt to meet the above goals in structuring them. Approach A: Logbook questionnaireThe logbook is an idea for a Lulu.com printed book to bring on field mapping missions for balloon mapping. Although this strategy can be reductive, compared to interviews, videos, etc, its standard approach yields data which we can graph, analyze and publish for public use. The results will be published here periodically. Any member of our community may use them for fundraising, outreach, or for example to print & carry to the beach to improve mapping technique. Read more at the Logbook page. A mini version of this questionnaire was used by Jen Hudon as part of her Grassroots Newark project and can be found here: Approach B: Community BlogThe community blog represents a way for members of our community to ... critical as well as positive... To contribute to the community blog, visit the Community Blog page Approach C: InterviewsWe're beginning a series of journalistic/narrative interviews with residents of the communities we work with. Read more at the interviews page. |
Revert | |
| 44 | liz |
May 09, 2018 15:08
| over 6 years ago
Welcome! This is the home for all things related to evaluation at Public Lab. Many different feedback efforts are ongoing in different sectors and we try to coordinate our efforts to minimize survey fatigue or redundancy. @liz leads the evaluation team! Ask questions below to find out more. Follow along with current workClick on the Trello boards below to see progress on 1) on our Snapshot Evaluation and Evaluation Framework (May 2015-May 2018) generously funded by the Rita Allen Foundation, 2) "pulse" feedback collected at in-person events with the Listen For Good 5 questions + 6 custom questions about the Public Lab mission and approach, 3) the year-round processes happening post-funding Trello Board Trello Board Trello Board Here's a link to the staff board for developing year-round evaluation tasks, being integrated into the third Trello board above: https://app.asana.com/0/645629000328698/board Community SurveyWe do an annual community-wide survey to better understand our community: Stakeholder interviewingA series of stakeholder interviews was done in 2017! You can read them here: [notes:series:community-interviews] User interface designSee the User Interface page for more on design work towards user interface and user interaction improvements. This is an area where many people are offering feedback! Questions[questions:evaluation] Related work[notes:evaluation] Older page content(From 2011 via @warren, interesting!) On this page we are in the process of summarizing and formulating our approach towards self-evaluation; as a community with strong principles, where we engage in open participation and advocacy in our partner communities, this process is not that of a typical researcher/participant nature. Rather, we seek to formulate an evaluative approach that takes into account:
GoalsGood evaluative approaches could enable us to:
ApproachesWe're going to use a few different approaches in performing (self-)evaluation -- each has pros and cons, but we will attempt to meet the above goals in structuring them. Approach A: Logbook questionnaireThe logbook is an idea for a Lulu.com printed book to bring on field mapping missions for balloon mapping. Although this strategy can be reductive, compared to interviews, videos, etc, its standard approach yields data which we can graph, analyze and publish for public use. The results will be published here periodically. Any member of our community may use them for fundraising, outreach, or for example to print & carry to the beach to improve mapping technique. Read more at the Logbook page. A mini version of this questionnaire was used by Jen Hudon as part of her Grassroots Newark project and can be found here: Approach B: Community BlogThe community blog represents a way for members of our community to ... critical as well as positive... To contribute to the community blog, visit the Community Blog page Approach C: InterviewsWe're beginning a series of journalistic/narrative interviews with residents of the communities we work with. Read more at the interviews page. |
Revert | |
| 43 | liz |
May 09, 2018 14:42
| over 6 years ago
Welcome! This is the home for all things related to evaluation at Public Lab. Many different feedback efforts are ongoing in different sectors and we try to coordinate our efforts to minimize survey fatigue or redundancy. @liz leads the evaluation team! Ask questions below to find out more. Follow along with current workClick on the Trello boards below to see progress 1) on our Snapshot Evaluation and Evaluation Framework (May 2015-May 2018) generously funded by the Rita Allen Foundation, 2) "pulse" feedback collected at in-person events, 3) the year-round processes happening post-funding: Trello Board Trello Board Trello Board Here's a link to the staff board for developing year-round evaluation tasks, being integrated into the third Trello board above: https://app.asana.com/0/645629000328698/board Community SurveyWe do an annual community-wide survey to better understand our community: Stakeholder interviewingA series of stakeholder interviews was done in 2017! You can read them here: [notes:series:community-interviews] User interface designSee the User Interface page for more on design work towards user interface and user interaction improvements. This is an area where many people are offering feedback! Questions[questions:evaluation] Related work[notes:evaluation] Older page content(From 2011 via @warren, interesting!) On this page we are in the process of summarizing and formulating our approach towards self-evaluation; as a community with strong principles, where we engage in open participation and advocacy in our partner communities, this process is not that of a typical researcher/participant nature. Rather, we seek to formulate an evaluative approach that takes into account:
GoalsGood evaluative approaches could enable us to:
ApproachesWe're going to use a few different approaches in performing (self-)evaluation -- each has pros and cons, but we will attempt to meet the above goals in structuring them. Approach A: Logbook questionnaireThe logbook is an idea for a Lulu.com printed book to bring on field mapping missions for balloon mapping. Although this strategy can be reductive, compared to interviews, videos, etc, its standard approach yields data which we can graph, analyze and publish for public use. The results will be published here periodically. Any member of our community may use them for fundraising, outreach, or for example to print & carry to the beach to improve mapping technique. Read more at the Logbook page. A mini version of this questionnaire was used by Jen Hudon as part of her Grassroots Newark project and can be found here: Approach B: Community BlogThe community blog represents a way for members of our community to ... critical as well as positive... To contribute to the community blog, visit the Community Blog page Approach C: InterviewsWe're beginning a series of journalistic/narrative interviews with residents of the communities we work with. Read more at the interviews page. |
Revert | |
| 42 | liz |
May 09, 2018 14:36
| over 6 years ago
Welcome! This is the home for all things related to evaluation at Public Lab. Many different feedback efforts are ongoing in different sectors and we try to coordinate our efforts to minimize survey fatigue or redundancy. @liz leads the evaluation team! Ask questions below to find out more. Follow along with current workClick on the Trello boards below to see progress on our Snapshot Evaluation and Evaluation Framework (May 2015-May 2018) generously funded by the Rita Allen Foundation, and "pulse" feedback collected at in-person events. Trello Board Trello Board Here's a link to our year-round evaluation task tracking board, currently only visible to staff, but coming soon as a Trello!: https://app.asana.com/0/645629000328698/board Community SurveyWe do an annual community-wide survey to better understand our community: Stakeholder interviewingA series of stakeholder interviews was done in 2017! You can read them here: [notes:series:community-interviews] User interface designSee the User Interface page for more on design work towards user interface and user interaction improvements. This is an area where many people are offering feedback! Questions[questions:evaluation] Related work[notes:evaluation] Older page content(From 2011 via @warren, interesting!) On this page we are in the process of summarizing and formulating our approach towards self-evaluation; as a community with strong principles, where we engage in open participation and advocacy in our partner communities, this process is not that of a typical researcher/participant nature. Rather, we seek to formulate an evaluative approach that takes into account:
GoalsGood evaluative approaches could enable us to:
ApproachesWe're going to use a few different approaches in performing (self-)evaluation -- each has pros and cons, but we will attempt to meet the above goals in structuring them. Approach A: Logbook questionnaireThe logbook is an idea for a Lulu.com printed book to bring on field mapping missions for balloon mapping. Although this strategy can be reductive, compared to interviews, videos, etc, its standard approach yields data which we can graph, analyze and publish for public use. The results will be published here periodically. Any member of our community may use them for fundraising, outreach, or for example to print & carry to the beach to improve mapping technique. Read more at the Logbook page. A mini version of this questionnaire was used by Jen Hudon as part of her Grassroots Newark project and can be found here: Approach B: Community BlogThe community blog represents a way for members of our community to ... critical as well as positive... To contribute to the community blog, visit the Community Blog page Approach C: InterviewsWe're beginning a series of journalistic/narrative interviews with residents of the communities we work with. Read more at the interviews page. |
Revert | |
| 41 | liz |
May 09, 2018 14:31
| over 6 years ago
Welcome! This is the home for all things related to evaluation at Public Lab. Many different feedback efforts are ongoing in different sectors and we try to coordinate our efforts to minimize survey fatigue or redundancy. @liz leads the evaluation team! Ask questions below to find out more. Follow along with current workClick on the Trello boards below to see progress on our Snapshot Evaluation and Evaluation Framework (May 2015-May 2018) generously funded by the Rita Allen Foundation, and "pulse" feedback collected at in-person events. Trello Board Trello Board Here's a link to our year-round evaluation task tracking board: https://app.asana.com/0/645629000328698/board Community SurveyWe do an annual community-wide survey to better understand our community: Stakeholder interviewingA series of stakeholder interviews was done in 2017! You can read them here: [notes:series:community-interviews] User interface designSee the User Interface page for more on design work towards user interface and user interaction improvements. This is an area where many people are offering feedback! Questions[questions:evaluation] Related work[notes:evaluation] Older page content(From 2011 via @warren, interesting!) On this page we are in the process of summarizing and formulating our approach towards self-evaluation; as a community with strong principles, where we engage in open participation and advocacy in our partner communities, this process is not that of a typical researcher/participant nature. Rather, we seek to formulate an evaluative approach that takes into account:
GoalsGood evaluative approaches could enable us to:
ApproachesWe're going to use a few different approaches in performing (self-)evaluation -- each has pros and cons, but we will attempt to meet the above goals in structuring them. Approach A: Logbook questionnaireThe logbook is an idea for a Lulu.com printed book to bring on field mapping missions for balloon mapping. Although this strategy can be reductive, compared to interviews, videos, etc, its standard approach yields data which we can graph, analyze and publish for public use. The results will be published here periodically. Any member of our community may use them for fundraising, outreach, or for example to print & carry to the beach to improve mapping technique. Read more at the Logbook page. A mini version of this questionnaire was used by Jen Hudon as part of her Grassroots Newark project and can be found here: Approach B: Community BlogThe community blog represents a way for members of our community to ... critical as well as positive... To contribute to the community blog, visit the Community Blog page Approach C: InterviewsWe're beginning a series of journalistic/narrative interviews with residents of the communities we work with. Read more at the interviews page. |
Revert | |
| 40 | liz |
May 09, 2018 14:23
| over 6 years ago
Welcome! This is the home for all things related to evaluation at Public Lab. Many different feedback efforts are ongoing in different sectors and we try to coordinate our efforts to minimize survey fatigue or redundancy. @liz leads the evaluation team! Ask questions below to find out more. Follow along with current workClick on the Trello board below to see progress on our Snapshot Evaluation and Evaluation Framework (May 2015-May 2018), generously funded by the Rita Allen Foundation! Trello Board Trello Board Community SurveyWe do an annual community-wide survey to better understand our community: Stakeholder interviewingA series of stakeholder interviews was done in 2017! You can read them here: [notes:series:community-interviews] User interface designSee the User Interface page for more on design work towards user interface and user interaction improvements. This is an area where many people are offering feedback! Questions[questions:evaluation] Related work[notes:evaluation] Older page content(From 2011 via @warren, interesting!) On this page we are in the process of summarizing and formulating our approach towards self-evaluation; as a community with strong principles, where we engage in open participation and advocacy in our partner communities, this process is not that of a typical researcher/participant nature. Rather, we seek to formulate an evaluative approach that takes into account:
GoalsGood evaluative approaches could enable us to:
ApproachesWe're going to use a few different approaches in performing (self-)evaluation -- each has pros and cons, but we will attempt to meet the above goals in structuring them. Approach A: Logbook questionnaireThe logbook is an idea for a Lulu.com printed book to bring on field mapping missions for balloon mapping. Although this strategy can be reductive, compared to interviews, videos, etc, its standard approach yields data which we can graph, analyze and publish for public use. The results will be published here periodically. Any member of our community may use them for fundraising, outreach, or for example to print & carry to the beach to improve mapping technique. Read more at the Logbook page. A mini version of this questionnaire was used by Jen Hudon as part of her Grassroots Newark project and can be found here: Approach B: Community BlogThe community blog represents a way for members of our community to ... critical as well as positive... To contribute to the community blog, visit the Community Blog page Approach C: InterviewsWe're beginning a series of journalistic/narrative interviews with residents of the communities we work with. Read more at the interviews page. |
Revert | |
| 39 | liz |
May 09, 2018 13:19
| over 6 years ago
Welcome! This is the home for all things related to evaluation at Public Lab. Many different feedback efforts are ongoing in different sectors and we try to coordinate our efforts to minimize survey fatigue or redundancy. @liz leads the evaluation team! Ask questions below to find out more. Follow along with current workClick on the Trello board below to see progress on our Snapshot Evaluation and Evaluation Framework (May 2015-May 2018), generously funded by the Rita Allen Foundation! Trello Board Community SurveyWe do an annual community-wide survey to better understand our community: Stakeholder interviewingA series of stakeholder interviews was done in 2017! You can read them here: [notes:series:community-interviews] User interface designSee the User Interface page for more on design work towards user interface and user interaction improvements. This is an area where many people are offering feedback! Questions[questions:evaluation] Related work[notes:evaluation] Older page content(From 2011 via @warren, interesting!) On this page we are in the process of summarizing and formulating our approach towards self-evaluation; as a community with strong principles, where we engage in open participation and advocacy in our partner communities, this process is not that of a typical researcher/participant nature. Rather, we seek to formulate an evaluative approach that takes into account:
GoalsGood evaluative approaches could enable us to:
ApproachesWe're going to use a few different approaches in performing (self-)evaluation -- each has pros and cons, but we will attempt to meet the above goals in structuring them. Approach A: Logbook questionnaireThe logbook is an idea for a Lulu.com printed book to bring on field mapping missions for balloon mapping. Although this strategy can be reductive, compared to interviews, videos, etc, its standard approach yields data which we can graph, analyze and publish for public use. The results will be published here periodically. Any member of our community may use them for fundraising, outreach, or for example to print & carry to the beach to improve mapping technique. Read more at the Logbook page. A mini version of this questionnaire was used by Jen Hudon as part of her Grassroots Newark project and can be found here: Approach B: Community BlogThe community blog represents a way for members of our community to ... critical as well as positive... To contribute to the community blog, visit the Community Blog page Approach C: InterviewsWe're beginning a series of journalistic/narrative interviews with residents of the communities we work with. Read more at the interviews page. |
Revert | |
| 38 | liz |
May 09, 2018 12:45
| over 6 years ago
Welcome! This is the home for all things related to evaluation at Public Lab. Many different evaluation efforts are ongoing and we try to coordinate our efforts to minimize survey fatigue or redundancy. @liz leads the evaluation team! Ask questions below to find out more. Follow along with current workClick on the Trello board below to see progress on our Snapshot Evaluation and Evaluation Framwork, generously funded by the Rita Allen Foundation! Trello Board Community SurveyWe do an annual community-wide survey to better understand our community: Stakeholder interviewingA series of stakeholder interviews was done in 2017! You can read them here: [notes:series:community-interviews] User interface designSee the User Interface page for more on design work towards user interface and user interaction improvements. This is an area where many people are offering feedback! Questions[questions:evaluation] Related work[notes:evaluation] Older page content(From 2011 via @warren, interesting!) On this page we are in the process of summarizing and formulating our approach towards self-evaluation; as a community with strong principles, where we engage in open participation and advocacy in our partner communities, this process is not that of a typical researcher/participant nature. Rather, we seek to formulate an evaluative approach that takes into account:
GoalsGood evaluative approaches could enable us to:
ApproachesWe're going to use a few different approaches in performing (self-)evaluation -- each has pros and cons, but we will attempt to meet the above goals in structuring them. Approach A: Logbook questionnaireThe logbook is an idea for a Lulu.com printed book to bring on field mapping missions for balloon mapping. Although this strategy can be reductive, compared to interviews, videos, etc, its standard approach yields data which we can graph, analyze and publish for public use. The results will be published here periodically. Any member of our community may use them for fundraising, outreach, or for example to print & carry to the beach to improve mapping technique. Read more at the Logbook page. A mini version of this questionnaire was used by Jen Hudon as part of her Grassroots Newark project and can be found here: Approach B: Community BlogThe community blog represents a way for members of our community to ... critical as well as positive... To contribute to the community blog, visit the Community Blog page Approach C: InterviewsWe're beginning a series of journalistic/narrative interviews with residents of the communities we work with. Read more at the interviews page. |
Revert | |
| 37 | liz |
March 07, 2018 22:29
| almost 7 years ago
A page for all things related to evaluation at Public Lab. Many different evaluation efforts are ongoing across Public Lab and we try to coordinate our efforts to minimize survey fatigue or redundancy. @liz leads the evaluation team! Ask questions below to find out more. Follow along with current workTrello Board Community SurveyWe do an annual community-wide survey to better understand our community: Stakeholder interviewingA series of stakeholder interviews was done in 2017! You can read them here: [notes:series:community-interviews] User interface designSee the User Interface page for more on design work towards user interface and user interaction improvements. Questions[questions:evaluation] Related work[notes:evaluation] Older page content(From 2011 via @warren, interesting!) On this page we are in the process of summarizing and formulating our approach towards self-evaluation; as a community with strong principles, where we engage in open participation and advocacy in our partner communities, this process is not that of a typical researcher/participant nature. Rather, we seek to formulate an evaluative approach that takes into account:
GoalsGood evaluative approaches could enable us to:
ApproachesWe're going to use a few different approaches in performing (self-)evaluation -- each has pros and cons, but we will attempt to meet the above goals in structuring them. Approach A: Logbook questionnaireThe logbook is an idea for a Lulu.com printed book to bring on field mapping missions for balloon mapping. Although this strategy can be reductive, compared to interviews, videos, etc, its standard approach yields data which we can graph, analyze and publish for public use. The results will be published here periodically. Any member of our community may use them for fundraising, outreach, or for example to print & carry to the beach to improve mapping technique. Read more at the Logbook page. A mini version of this questionnaire was used by Jen Hudon as part of her Grassroots Newark project and can be found here: Approach B: Community BlogThe community blog represents a way for members of our community to ... critical as well as positive... To contribute to the community blog, visit the Community Blog page Approach C: InterviewsWe're beginning a series of journalistic/narrative interviews with residents of the communities we work with. Read more at the interviews page. |
Revert |