response:12442
response:12442


Author Comment Last activity Moderation
Claytonb "@Thorsten - you are correct the images were mislabeled. Thanks for the heads up. I have corrected the labels. Thanks again, Clayton " | Read more » about 8 years ago
Thorsten "@Claytonb, thanks for the test. I assume the images are correct but the channels in the image captions are somehow mixed up. I guess it should be: ..." | Read more » about 8 years ago
cfastie "Okay, looks good. You just have to put carriage returns or two spaces after a line or an image to make it insert a return. " | Read more » about 8 years ago
Claytonb "The filter size I have in the Canon S100's are 8.9 X 7.9 X 1. The sensor screws are each backed out approximately 3/4 turn from the factory positio..." | Read more » about 8 years ago
Claytonb "@cfastie Apologies Chris I had to fix the image layout and labels and couldn't edit right so I'm reposting.These are from the MidOpt DB 475/850 and..." | Read more » about 8 years ago
cfastie "Wow, the 660/850 camera focuses well across the image. That's good to know it can be done with a 1.0 mm thick filter. The 475/850 camera looks a li..." | Read more » about 8 years ago
cfastie "Hi @Claytonb, That's good to know. Did you compare the different channels to see if some showed any vignetting? A photo of an evenly lit solid fie..." | Read more » about 8 years ago
Claytonb "@cfastie -I can confirm that mounting the filter internally does correct the vignetting problem. I have mounted a DB475/850 and DB660/850 in place ..." | Read more » about 8 years ago
cfastie "I hadn't considered aperture as a reason for the vignetting. I assume it is related to the angle at which the light enters the filter. Dichroic fil..." | Read more » over 8 years ago
Claytonb "@cfastie -Hi Chris, Is it possible that the vignetting your seeing is related to wavelength interference due to aperture size? Have you tried a lar..." | Read more » over 8 years ago