peer-production
peer-production


Author Comment Last activity Moderation
funnyjokes " The article you have shared here very good. This is really interesting information for me. Thanks for sharing! webnovel " | Read more » about 6 years ago
warren "Here's an example from the /r/politics subreddit, and an example of it failing: " | Read more » almost 7 years ago
liz "What does "rule posting" actually look like? " | Read more » almost 7 years ago
liz "Check out this Reddit AMA about the "Free The Science" initiative: https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/58gbl0/science_ama_series_were_prof_ge..." | Read more » about 8 years ago
liz "Here's a link to a journal article from @philipsilva: Introduction This paper will provide an historical description of the development of the sc..." | Read more » about 8 years ago
liz "Reposting resources that OpenAIRE sent out last week: For this last day of Peer Review week, OpenAIRE is releasing a new report detailing three ex..." | Read more » about 8 years ago
stoft "I like your approach and like keeping the top-level choice up front. I'm also thinking that perhaps there should be a pre-defined list of categorie..." | Read more » over 8 years ago
gretchengehrke "Hi folks, I'm late to this comment thread, but am really excited about it. I generally want to support and echo many of @stoft's comments, particul..." | Read more » over 8 years ago
stoft "@Warren's thought about 'publishing assistance' is a good one and one which inherantly contains a filter mechanism. Orthogonal to a list of topic-b..." | Read more » over 8 years ago
warren "However, science (ideally) is not about feelings I just wanted to clarify that the goal of encouraging new contributors is not in order to preserv..." | Read more » over 8 years ago
david-days "@viechdokter, I would put in @stoft and @cfastie's description as an additional process, which makes it immediately backwards compatible. By "add..." | Read more » over 8 years ago
stoft "@viechdokter, perhaps even here, terminology can be problematic. Example: 'Ranking'. There really are many interpretations and implications of the ..." | Read more » over 8 years ago
viechdokter "@stoft: I support the idea of a review committee. Not for ranking but for advice. Makes much more sense in promoting the quality stuff and in advis..." | Read more » over 8 years ago
viechdokter "I still wonder... if the little boy coincidentally meets Sir Newton in the garden and asks about the apple and the moon he might just get an answer..." | Read more » over 8 years ago
stoft "I agree with @cfastie that such a process should encourage contributors to improve upon documenting their work and I think "PLab" can play a leadin..." | Read more » over 8 years ago
cfastie "@stoft’s concerns about the effectiveness of a crowd-based and rule-based ranking system are probably justified because the active publiclab commun..." | Read more » over 8 years ago
cfastie "I had not considered legacy research notes, but I have a different view of them. Implementing some form of review has two main consequences: it sep..." | Read more » over 8 years ago
david-days "@stoft--I think that is a very good summary of the articles that @liz and @warren posted as references. It is also a good reason to at least try t..." | Read more » over 8 years ago
stoft "Hmmm, my guess is that a realistic system for scientific material from such diverse sources cannot simply rely on a set of automated rules and sear..." | Read more » over 8 years ago
david-days "Well, if you look at the math that would support it, it actually becomes a bit more nuanced. (We can always adjust). However, let's suppose that w..." | Read more » over 8 years ago
stoft "@cfaste does have some good points; clear rank topics, finite review period and minimum rank numbers in some form. I'd also agree that pitfalls are..." | Read more » over 8 years ago
cfastie "That's very clever that users with good reputations can counteract unscrupulous newbies gaming the system for their buds. It would be cool if users..." | Read more » over 8 years ago
david-days "I think that @cfastie has a good point...or set of points. One slight modification would be to put weights on the users and rankings. A combinati..." | Read more » over 8 years ago
cfastie "Here is a proposal which might reconcile a few of the ideas presented here including: @stoft’s great idea of using a checklist to determine if a ..." | Read more » over 8 years ago