## Choosing Sensors Often the first step is to look for a sensor for what you're hoping to measure. In the community posts below, we're collecting info on different kinds of air quality sensors, and their: * cost * sensitivity/accuracy * links and documentation Can you afford a sensor? Can it detect what you're looking for? Where can you learn more about it? ### Posts about choosing and evaluating an air sensor [notes:grid:air-sensor-eval] ### Expected ranges and useful detection limits for pollutants of interest This [table](https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-06/documents/air_sensors_webinar_slides_06-29-16.pdf) from an EPA [Air Quality Monitoring and Community Science webinar](https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-06/documents/air_sensors_webinar_slides_06-29-16.pdf) lists the six criteria air pollutants and a couple additional pollutants, with background levels you might see in the environment in the “Range to Expect” column and useful detection limits for sensors. **** ## Wikis about air sensors [wikis:air-sensors] ## Air sensor projects Public Lab pages and posts tagged `air-sensor-projects` will appear here [nodes:air-sensor-projects] ## Questions [questions:air-sensors] ## Further reading and resources + Environmental consultant Tim Dye’s “[4 questions to ask before buying an air quality sensor](http://tdenviro.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/4-questions-when-buying-air-sensors.pdf)” neatly summarizes what to consider when choosing an air sensor. + [Snuffle.org](http://www.snuffle.org/): lots of information on low-cost sensors for various air pollutants. + [Air Quality Sensor Performance Evaluation Center (AQ-SPEC)](http://www.aqmd.gov/aq-spec/evaluations): from the South Coast Air Quality Management District, this program tests and evaluates air sensors “in the field, under ambient conditions, and in the laboratory under controlled environmental conditions.” + [Air Sensor Toolbox](https://www.epa.gov/air-sensor-toolbox): from the US Environmental Protection Agency, this toolbox includes guidance on how to use air sensors and their data, plus information on sensor performance and evaluation results. ...
Author | Comment | Last activity | Moderation | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
kensanfran | "Hi Neil, Thanks for your nice comments. Yes, I think the general issue of data quality from citizen science sensors is finally starting to get the..." | Read more » | about 10 years ago | |||
nbmasson | "Nice work! Looks like a clean and well-designed module. FYI, you can find some more open-source info at http://mobilesensingtechnology.com/ with s..." | Read more » | about 10 years ago | |||
neilh20 | "Hey fantastic to have a calibrated gas sensor as the starting point. It is essential to the definition of "quality" in any air quality measurement ..." | Read more » | about 10 years ago | |||
rjstatic | "Thanks @cversek! The first power supply we tried was some cheap $1.50 things we found on Amazon (see the Ground Computing thread here) so when you ..." | Read more » | about 10 years ago | |||
cversek | "Hi RJ, it was me who Don was talking to. I find it amusing that if everyone stuck to the digital world no one would know (or care) how junky many ..." | Read more » | about 10 years ago | |||
epongrat | "I'm not positive it will work. My arduino kit came with a small photoresistor, pictured here. I asked my advisor, Charlie Schweik to purchase an..." | Read more » | about 10 years ago | |||
lauradietz | "These are a bunch of great ideas! Can you explain how the sensor will help you decide where to place solar panels? " | Read more » | about 10 years ago | |||
stevie | "Hi Matthew! Can I use the picture of the Dustduino in a presentation I'm giving on Wednesday? Hope all is well, did you get any sent off to Wiscons..." | Read more » | about 10 years ago | |||
eustatic | "great visuals " | Read more » | about 10 years ago | |||
beadias | "alxmjo: Sorry about the delay in replying. Here is the digikey part number for the fan we use: 563-1111-ND. We checked out your DIY set up - glad t..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
stevie | "Hi Willie! The next OpenHour (http://publiclab.org/wiki/openhour) is on Air Quality and Air Quality monitoring tools. Would love to hear about this..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
mathew | "Thank you so much for the clarification David! I'll work that into our summaries. its been hard to get a handle on exactly what is meant by that s..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
DavidMack | "@amysoyka The Powermag graphic portrays the PM fractions based on source sampling techniques used for power plant emission sampling. The source sa..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
amysoyka | "Sure - the source for that image is the link in the comment above it by the way. I like super-visual. Apparently so does Stephen Hawking - who app..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
warren | "Wow Amy that is a SUPER visual explanation! Want to add it (with credit and maybe a "not open licensed" notice) to the particulates page? http://pu..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
jefffalk | "Let's try again. Gravimetric monitors capture particles and allow a weight of those captured to be determined. The distribution of aerodynamic diam..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
amysoyka | "Oh & this picture is just awesome too!: " | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
amysoyka | "This article explains in some detail about the point Matthew just made: http://www.powermag.com/blog/pm2-5-more-than-just-dust/ " | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
stevie | "Love this project. Would you be interested in sharing the idea on an OpenHour? we have one on Air Quality scheduled for July 28th! " | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
mathew | "yeah, l their comments are moderated. mine is still in the queue. " | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
mathew | "I've been operating on the assumption that the EPA/ISO standard = PM2.5. I guess this is an etymology question. which came first: PM2.5 or the EP..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
jefffalk | "As I understand it PM2.5 implies an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 microns, straight forward with no "mean" involved. The "mean" enters with the epa ..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
warren | "Are comments moderated there? I don't see your comment but it's a very important clarification to make. Thanks, Mathew! " | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
mathew | "maintenance is an issue-- look at these dylos monitors in China building up particulates http://aqicn.org/faq/2013-10-21/dylos-air-particule-conter..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago |