If you’ve given soil samples to a lab for contaminant testing and received the results, one of th...
Public Lab is an open community which collaboratively develops accessible, open source, Do-It-Yourself technologies for investigating local environmental health and justice issues.
3 CURRENT | bhamster |
March 05, 2021 20:29
| almost 4 years ago
If you’ve given soil samples to a lab for contaminant testing and received the results, one of the next steps is to interpret the results and make meaning of them. You might have a short document listing test results from the lab, or a longer report that includes some summarizing and recommended actions.
Please contribute to the resources below by editing this page or adding and answering questions!
You can also follow along and get updates on this topic by subscribing to the interpret-soil-tests tag Guides and activities to tryHere are some resources and activities that can help you understand the kinds of information in soil test results and how to interpret them. Some of these activities explain how community members can work together on reviewing documents. Activities[notes:grid:activity:interpret-soil-tests] These activities involve comparing the measured amounts of chemicals reported in your results to health-based standards or screening levels set by a government agency. The standard level is the amount of chemical over which there might be concerns, and more detailed testing would probably be helpful. “Health-based” means that the standard considers potential impacts on human health.
Some notes on terminology
When looking for standards to compare your soil test results to, you might see words like screening levels, target levels, cleanup objectives, and others. Below is some information on how those terms can mean different things.
In a survey of regulatory agencies in several states across the US, here’s how the states usually defined terms (paraphrased from pg. 44 of this document):
From: ITRC (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council). 2005. Examination of Risk-Based Screening Values and Approaches of Selected States. RISK-1. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Risk Assessment Resources Team. For more information about screening levels, this section) explains what screening levels are and how they relate to human health. Example sources for health-based standardsAs mentioned in the posts above, standard levels can vary by city, state, country, and agency. In “How to interpret soil test results,” you’ll find a table comparing standards from different regions and agencies for various contaminants. Your soil test results or report might already list local standard or screening levels next to your results. If not, here are some different sources for standards:
More background on technical documents and standard levels[notes:grid:interpret-results-intro] QuestionsQuestions from the Public Lab community tagged with [questions:interpret-soil-tests] Additional resources and guides
Getting technical supportIf you’re looking for additional support in understanding and interpreting soil test results, here are some resources on approaches to try: Partnering with a Local College for Environmental Testing Post a question or issue brief on Public Lab Some examples of how Public Lab community members have worked together on evaluating and interpreting reports: You can post your own question about interpreting soil tests here, or post an issue brief here. |
Revert | |
2 | bhamster |
March 05, 2021 20:24
| almost 4 years ago
If you’ve given soil samples to a lab for contaminant testing and received the results, one of the next steps is to interpret the results and make meaning of them. You might have a short document listing test results from the lab, or a longer report that includes some summarizing and recommended actions. Guides and activities to tryHere are some resources and activities that can help you understand the kinds of information in soil test results and how to interpret them. Some of these activities explain how community members can work together on reviewing documents.
Please contribute to the resources below by editing this page or adding and answering questions!
You can also follow along and get updates on this topic by subscribing to the `interpret-soil-tests` tag Activities[notes:grid:activity:interpret-soil-tests] These activities involve comparing the measured amounts of chemicals reported in your results to health-based standards or screening levels set by a government agency. The standard level is the amount of chemical over which there might be concerns, and more detailed testing would probably be helpful. “Health-based” means that the standard considers potential impacts on human health.
Some notes on terminology
When looking for standards to compare your soil test results to, you might see words like screening levels, target levels, cleanup objectives, and others. Below is some information on how those terms can mean different things.
In a survey of regulatory agencies in several states across the US, here’s how the states usually defined terms (paraphrased from pg. 44 of this document):
From: ITRC (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council). 2005. Examination of Risk-Based Screening Values and Approaches of Selected States. RISK-1. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Risk Assessment Resources Team. For more information about screening levels, this section) explains what screening levels are and how they relate to human health. Example sources for health-based standardsAs mentioned in the posts above, standard levels can vary by city, state, country, and agency. In “How to interpret soil test results,” you’ll find a table comparing standards from different regions and agencies for various contaminants. Your soil test results or report might already list local standard or screening levels next to your results. If not, here are some different sources for standards:
More background on technical documents and standard levels[notes:grid:interpret-results-intro] QuestionsQuestions from the Public Lab community tagged with [questions:interpret-soil-tests] Additional resources and guides
Getting technical supportIf you’re looking for additional support in understanding and interpreting soil test results, here are some resources on approaches to try: Partnering with a Local College for Environmental Testing Post a question or issue brief on Public Lab Some examples of how Public Lab community members have worked together on evaluating and interpreting reports: You can post your own question about interpreting soil tests here, or post an issue brief here. |
Revert | |
1 | bhamster |
March 05, 2021 19:55
| almost 4 years ago
If you’ve given soil samples to a lab for contaminant testing and received the results, one of the next steps is to interpret the results and make meaning of them. You might have a short document listing test results from the lab, or a longer report that includes some summarizing and recommended actions. Guides and activities to tryHere are some resources and activities that can help you understand the kinds of information in soil test results and how to interpret them. Some of these activities explain how community members can work together on reviewing documents. Activities[notes:grid:activity:interpret-soil-tests] These activities involve comparing the measured amounts of chemicals reported in your results to health-based standards or screening levels set by a government agency. The standard level is the amount of chemical over which there might be concerns, and more detailed testing would probably be helpful. “Health-based” means that the standard considers potential impacts on human health.
Some notes on terminology
When looking for standards to compare your soil test results to, you might see words like screening levels, target levels, cleanup objectives, and others. Below is some information on how those terms can mean different things.
In a survey of regulatory agencies in several states across the US, here’s how the states usually defined terms (paraphrased from pg. 44 of this document):
From: ITRC (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council). 2005. Examination of Risk-Based Screening Values and Approaches of Selected States. RISK-1. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Risk Assessment Resources Team. For more information about screening levels, this section) explains what screening levels are and how they relate to human health. Example sources for health-based standardsAs mentioned in the posts above, standard levels can vary by city, state, country, and agency. In “How to interpret soil test results,” you’ll find a table comparing standards from different regions and agencies for various contaminants. Your soil test results or report might already list local standard or screening levels next to your results. If not, here are some different sources for standards:
More background on technical documents and standard levels[notes:grid:interpret-results-intro] Additional resources and guides |
Revert | |
0 | bhamster |
March 05, 2021 19:50
| almost 4 years ago
If you’ve given soil samples to a lab for contaminant testing and received the results, one of the next steps is to interpret the results and make meaning of them. You might have a short document listing test results from the lab, or a longer report that includes some summarizing and recommended actions. Guides and activities to tryHere are some resources and activities that can help you understand the kinds of information in soil test results and how to interpret them. Some of these activities explain how community members can work together on reviewing documents. Activities[activities:grid:interpret-soil-tests] These activities involve comparing the measured amounts of chemicals reported in your results to health-based standards or screening levels set by a government agency. The standard level is the amount of chemical over which there might be concerns, and more detailed testing would probably be helpful. “Health-based” means that the standard considers potential impacts on human health.
Some notes on terminology
When looking for standards to compare your soil test results to, you might see words like screening levels, target levels, cleanup objectives, and others. Below is some information on how those terms can mean different things.
In a survey of regulatory agencies in several states across the US, here’s how the states usually defined terms (paraphrased from pg. 44 of this document):
From: ITRC (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council). 2005. Examination of Risk-Based Screening Values and Approaches of Selected States. RISK-1. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Risk Assessment Resources Team. For more information about screening levels, this section) explains what screening levels are and how they relate to human health. Example sources for health-based standardsAs mentioned in the posts above, standard levels can vary by city, state, country, and agency. In “How to interpret soil test results,” you’ll find a table comparing standards from different regions and agencies for various contaminants. Your soil test results or report might already list local standard or screening levels next to your results. If not, here are some different sources for standards:
More background on technical documents and standard levels[notes:grid:interpret-results-intro] Additional resources and guides |
Revert |