Help get the word out Keep in mind, this is a consensus process, not a requirement. That said, m...
Public Lab is an open community which collaboratively develops accessible, open source, Do-It-Yourself technologies for investigating local environmental health and justice issues.
| 9 CURRENT | warren |
July 18, 2012 12:25
| almost 11 years ago
Help get the word outKeep in mind, this is a consensus process, not a requirement. That said, many of us believe that it is a key part a functional open science initiative, so we hope everyone will participate by signing the agreement.
People we need to contact (7)(remember that if people signed up after April 17, 2012, they accepted the CERN OHL during registration)
Haven't created research notes but would be nice to have agreement:
More specific agreement wordingOur IP lawyer helped draft this more detailed agreement which we should consider using: http://publiclaboratory.org/wiki/ohl-agreement Draft emailIn reaching out to contributors, a custom email enumerating what someone has brought to the project is best, but it may be helpful to have a form email if you're emailing a lot of people: Hi, >recipient name here< I'm getting in touch because you've contributed to Public Laboratory open source technologies, and we are in the process of adopting a new open source hardware license allowing our community to better protect our collective design work and to keep it open, transparent, and public. The license proposed is the CERN Open Hardware License: http://www.ohwr.org/cernohl As a valued member of our community, I want to encourage you to read over the proposal and if you agree, to indicate your agreement and license the work which you have published or contributed at Public Laboratory to date. Please learn more and take action here: http://publiclaboratory.org/wiki/open-hardware-licensing There is also an active conversation on the subject at the Public Lab mailing list. Best, >your name here< Once we have agreement
|
Revert | |
| 8 | warren |
July 18, 2012 12:17
| almost 11 years ago
Help get the word outKeep in mind, this is a consensus process, not a requirement. That said, many of us believe that it is a key part a functional open science initiative, so we hope everyone will participate by signing the agreement.
People we need to contact (8)(remember that if people signed up after April 17, 2012, they accepted the CERN OHL during registration)
Haven't created research notes but would be nice to have agreement:
More specific agreement wordingOur IP lawyer helped draft this more detailed agreement which we should consider using: http://publiclaboratory.org/wiki/ohl-agreement Draft emailIn reaching out to contributors, a custom email enumerating what someone has brought to the project is best, but it may be helpful to have a form email if you're emailing a lot of people: Hi, >recipient name here< I'm getting in touch because you've contributed to Public Laboratory open source technologies, and we are in the process of adopting a new open source hardware license allowing our community to better protect our collective design work and to keep it open, transparent, and public. The license proposed is the CERN Open Hardware License: http://www.ohwr.org/cernohl As a valued member of our community, I want to encourage you to read over the proposal and if you agree, to indicate your agreement and license the work which you have published or contributed at Public Laboratory to date. Please learn more and take action here: http://publiclaboratory.org/wiki/open-hardware-licensing There is also an active conversation on the subject at the Public Lab mailing list. Best, >your name here< Once we have agreement
|
Revert | |
| 7 | warren |
June 01, 2012 12:44
| almost 11 years ago
Help get the word outKeep in mind, this is a consensus process, not a requirement. That said, many of us believe that it is a key part a functional open science initiative, so we hope everyone will participate by signing the agreement.
People we need to contact(remember that if people signed up after April 17, 2012, they accepted the CERN OHL during registration)
Haven't created research notes but would be nice to have agreement:
More specific agreement wordingOur IP lawyer helped draft this more detailed agreement which we should consider using: http://publiclaboratory.org/wiki/ohl-agreement Draft emailIn reaching out to contributors, a custom email enumerating what someone has brought to the project is best, but it may be helpful to have a form email if you're emailing a lot of people: Hi, >recipient name here< I'm getting in touch because you've contributed to Public Laboratory open source technologies, and we are in the process of adopting a new open source hardware license allowing our community to better protect our collective design work and to keep it open, transparent, and public. The license proposed is the CERN Open Hardware License: http://www.ohwr.org/cernohl As a valued member of our community, I want to encourage you to read over the proposal and if you agree, to indicate your agreement and license the work which you have published or contributed at Public Laboratory to date. Please learn more and take action here: http://publiclaboratory.org/wiki/open-hardware-licensing There is also an active conversation on the subject at the Public Lab mailing list. Best, >your name here< Once we have agreement
|
Revert | |
| 6 | warren |
May 16, 2012 16:26
| about 11 years ago
Help get the word outKeep in mind, this is a consensus process, not a requirement. That said, many of us believe that it is a key part a functional open science initiative, so we hope everyone will participate by signing the agreement.
People we need to contact(remember that if people signed up after April 17, 2012, they accepted the CERN OHL during registration)
Haven't created research notes but would be nice to have agreement:
More specific agreement wordingOur IP lawyer helped draft this more detailed agreement which we should consider using: http://publiclaboratory.org/wiki/ohl-agreement Draft emailIn reaching out to contributors, a custom email enumerating what someone has brought to the project is best, but it may be helpful to have a form email if you're emailing a lot of people: Hi, >recipient name here< I'm getting in touch because you've contributed to Public Laboratory open source technologies, and we are in the process of adopting a new open source hardware license allowing our community to better protect our collective design work and to keep it open, transparent, and public. The license proposed is the CERN Open Hardware License: http://www.ohwr.org/cernohl As a valued member of our community, I want to encourage you to read over the proposal and if you agree, to indicate your agreement and license the work which you have published or contributed at Public Laboratory to date. Please learn more and take action here: http://publiclaboratory.org/wiki/open-hardware-licensing There is also an active conversation on the subject at the Public Lab mailing list. Best, >your name here< Once we have agreement
|
Revert | |
| 5 | warren |
May 01, 2012 21:32
| about 11 years ago
Help get the word outKeep in mind, this is a consensus process, not a requirement. That said, many of us believe that it is a key part a functional open science initiative, so we hope everyone will participate by signing the agreement.
People we need to contact(remember that if people signed up after April 17, 2012, they accepted the CERN OHL during registration)
Haven't created research notes but would be nice to have agreement:
Draft emailIn reaching out to contributors, a custom email enumerating what someone has brought to the project is best, but it may be helpful to have a form email if you're emailing a lot of people: Hi, >recipient name here< I'm getting in touch because you've contributed to Public Laboratory open source technologies, and we are in the process of adopting a new open source hardware license allowing our community to better protect our collective design work and to keep it open, transparent, and public. The license proposed is the CERN Open Hardware License: http://www.ohwr.org/cernohl As a valued member of our community, I want to encourage you to read over the proposal and if you agree, to indicate your agreement and license the work which you have published or contributed at Public Laboratory to date. Please learn more and take action here: http://publiclaboratory.org/wiki/open-hardware-licensing There is also an active conversation on the subject at the Public Lab mailing list. Best, >your name here< Once we have agreement
|
Revert | |
| 4 | warren |
May 01, 2012 21:26
| about 11 years ago
Help get the word outKeep in mind, this is a consensus process, not a requirement. That said, many of us believe that it is a key part a functional open science initiative, so we hope everyone will participate by signing the agreement.
People we need to contact(remember that if people signed up after April 17, 2012, they accepted the CERN OHL during registration)
Haven't created research notes but would be nice to have agreement:
Draft emailIn reaching out to contributors, a custom email enumerating what someone has brought to the project is best, but it may be helpful to have a form email if you're emailing a lot of people: Hi, >recipient name here< I'm getting in touch because you've contributed to Public Laboratory open source technologies, and we are in the process of adopting a new open source hardware license allowing our community to better protect our collective design work and to keep it open, transparent, and public. The license proposed is the CERN Open Hardware License: http://www.ohwr.org/cernohl As a valued member of our community, I want to encourage you to read over the proposal and if you agree, to indicate your agreement and license the work which you have published or contributed at Public Laboratory to date. Please learn more and take action here: http://publiclaboratory.org/wiki/open-hardware-licensing There is also an active conversation on the subject at the Public Lab mailing list. Best, >your name here< Once we have agreement
|
Revert | |
| 3 | warren |
March 05, 2012 17:38
| about 11 years ago
Help get the word outKeep in mind, this is a consensus process, not a requirement. That said, many of us believe that it is a key part a functional open science initiative, so we hope everyone will participate by signing the agreement.
Per-tool tasksList here who we've contacted and who we're waiting to hear from on a per-tool basis. Or people we need to contact. Balloon Mapping Need to contact:
Thermal Flashlight
Draft emailIn reaching out to contributors, a custom email enumerating what someone has brought to the project is best, but it may be helpful to have a form email if you're emailing a lot of people: Hi, >recipient name here< I'm getting in touch because you've contributed to Public Laboratory open source technologies, and we are in the process of adopting a new open source hardware license allowing our community to better protect our collective design work and to keep it open, transparent, and public. The license proposed is the CERN Open Hardware License: http://www.ohwr.org/cernohl As a valued member of our community, I want to encourage you to read over the proposal and if you agree, to indicate your agreement and license the work which you have published or contributed at Public Laboratory to date. Please learn more and take action here: http://publiclaboratory.org/wiki/open-hardware-licensing There is also an active conversation on the subject at the Public Lab mailing list. Best, >your name here< Once we have agreement
|
Revert | |
| 2 | warren |
March 05, 2012 17:26
| about 11 years ago
Help get the word outKeep in mind, this is a consensus process, not a requirement. That said, many of us believe that it is a key part a functional open science initiative, so we hope everyone will participate by signing the agreement.
Per-tool tasksList here who we've contacted and who we're waiting to hear from on a per-tool basis. Or people we need to contact. Balloon Mapping Need to contact:
Thermal Flashlight
Once we have agreement
|
Revert | |
| 1 | warren |
March 05, 2012 17:25
| about 11 years ago
IntroKeep in mind, this is a consensus process, not a requirement. That said, many of us believe that it is a key part a functional open science initiative, so we hope everyone will participate by signing the agreement.
Per-tool tasksList here who we've contacted and who we're waiting to hear from on a per-tool basis. Or people we need to contact. Balloon Mapping Need to contact:
Thermal Flashlight
Once we have agreement
|
Revert | |
| 0 | warren |
March 02, 2012 17:22
| about 11 years ago
IntroKeep in mind, this is a consensus process, not a requirement. That said, many of us believe that it is a key part a functional open science initiative, so we hope everyone will participate by signing the agreement.
Per-tool tasksList here who we've contacted and who we're waiting to hear from on a per-tool basis. Or people we need to contact. Balloon Mapping Need to contact:
Thermal Flashlight
... |
Revert |