Author | Comment | Last activity | Moderation | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
jhondue123456 | "https://www.google.com/ " | Read more » | 9 months ago | |||
cfastie | "That's very clever. " | Read more » | over 7 years ago | |||
dsvilko | "Better than the vertical blur would be to simply resize the image to be 1 pixel tall (most resizing algorithms do this by averaging) and then again..." | Read more » | over 7 years ago | |||
stef | "@warren Thanks for your comments. Prior to the IR filter removal, I had no indication that there was a light transmission through the cover proble..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
warren | "Also - do you have links to scans done with and without this light cover, in bright conditions, to show folks the advantage of additional light dam..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
warren | "Great build photos - I've added the upgrade:dssk tag to indicate to people that this is an upgrade that can work on the desktop spectrometer, and t..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
cfastie | "That sort of worked: https://spectralworkbench.org/analyze/spectrum/4476. I cut out a 50 pixel tall horizontal slice of the Snowy Sky spectrogram ..." | Read more » | almost 12 years ago | |||
warren | "You know what we need? vertical averaging to smooth out noise. In live/waterfall mode, this'd be time averaging. For your spec, it'd just be averag..." | Read more » | almost 12 years ago |