The Public Lab near infrared imaging project is an open source community effort to modify consumer cameras to capture near infrared imagery for a range of purposes, including plant health. All open or accessible near infrared imaging hardware and software efforts are welcome here! **Join in by:** * Reading about goals and asking great questions * Converting a camera using one of our starter kits * Trying (and critiquing) our community-made how-to guides * Posting your own how-to guides and mods * Building on others’ work; hack and remix the kits to refine and expand them * (proposed?) Submit your improvements for inclusion in an upcoming starter kit release or add-on * (proposed?) Serve on a Research Review Group for a 3 month period ## Activities This is a list of community-generated guides for specific applications using your near-infrared imaging setup (either a camera you converted yourself with a filter pack, a ready-made near-infrared camera, or double camera setup). Some may be more reproduced -- or reproducible -- than others. Try them out to build your skills, and help improve them by leaving comments. Together, we can repeat and refine the activities into experiments. [activities:multispectral-imaging] Add your guide here Request a guide _Guides should include a materials list and a step-by-step construction guide with photo documentation. See an example._ **** ## Hardware Mods Have you added to your starter kit, improved it, or redesigned it? Show others how to take it to the next level by posting a build guide here: [upgrades:multispectral-imaging] Add your hardware modification here Request a hardware modification _Upgrades should include a parts list and a step-by-step construction guide with photo documentation. See an example._ **** ## Builds There’s a lot going on in open source near-infrared imaging -- if you’ve developed another open source design you’d like to show others how to construct, post it here! * Rasberry Pi NoIR * X * XX **** ## Choosing a tool / Starter Kits The question to start with is whether you can capture all the channels you need for your research question with a single converted camera or whether you should use a dual camera rig with one converted camera and one unconverted. That choice plays out in terms of what filter (blue or red) to use for converting your camera. Public Lab’s Kits initiative offers several starter kits, one with the basic components and instructions for converting your own digital camera to capture near-infrared imagery and a second option -- a readymade lightweight near-infrared camera. The point of the kits is to lower the barrier to capturing your own near-infrared imagery. * **The Infragram filter pack** is our least expensive way to get started with near-infrared imaging, but it does require an afternoon and some technical work to perform the camera conversion yourself. ... etc etc etc **[Visit the Infragram DIY filter pack]()** * **The Infragram point and shoot** is a Mobius camera that we worked with a factory to modify. ... etc etc etc **[Visit the Infragram Point&Shoot page](/wiki/infragram-point-shoot)** **** ## Processing near-infrared imagery Once you take a multispectral photograph with a modified camera, you must post-process it, compositing the infrared and visible data to generate a new image which (if it works) displays healthy, photosynthetically active areas as bright regions. In-depth articles on the technique by Chris Fastie can be found here: * https://publiclab.org/wiki/ndvi * https://publiclab.org/wiki/ndvi-plots-ir-kit **** ## Software How to process your images: we're working on an easy process to generate composite, infrared + visible images that will reveal new details of plant health and photosynthesis. There are several approaches: * The **easiest way** is to process your images online at the free, open source [Infragram.org](http://infragram.org) * [Ned Horning's](/profile/nedhorning) [PhotoMonitoring plugin](/wiki/photo-monitoring-plugin) * Manual processing * [in Photoshop](/notes/warren/10-25-2011/video-tutorial-creating-infrared-composites-aerial-wetlands-imagery) * [or GIMP](/notes/warren/10-27-2011/video-tutorial-creating-false-color-ndvi-aerial-wetlands-imagery) * Command-line processing of single images and rendering of movies using a Python script: Source code is [here](https://github.com/Pioneer-Valley-Open-Science/infrapix) and here: [here](https://github.com/publiclab/infrapix) * For those who use the webcam and have a Python interpreter, there are some image processing codes available at [Python Webcam Codes](/wiki/python-webcam-codes) * Using MapKnitter.org (deprecated) **** ## Comparison to standard tools Infrared imagery for agricultural and ecological assessment is usually captured from satellites and planes, and the information is used mainly by large farms, vineyards, and academic research projects. For example, see this illustrated [PDF, page 210](http://www.beckshybrids.com/Portals/0/SiteContent/Literature/PFR%20Book%202010%20optimized%20small.pdf) from a commercial imagery provider who has been studying the usefulness of infrared imagery and has quotes from farmers who make use of it. There are public sources of infrared photography for the US available through the Department of Agriculture -- [NAIP](http://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov/) and [Vegscape](http://nassgeodata.gmu.edu/VegScape/) -- but this imagery is not collected when, as often, or at useable scale for individuals who are managing small plots. **** ## Frequently Asked Questions Ask a question about multispectral-imaging Get notified of new questions and help out [notes:question:multispectral-imaging] ...
Author | Comment | Last activity | Moderation | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
mathew | "Thanks Chris! " | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
cfastie | "That nice windows program for Mobius is not official, just written by the isoprop guy. I guess nobody has done it yet for the Mac. Here is the con..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
mathew | "I've been manually editing the config file-- the only thing I can't figure out is how to turn on the custom white balance. " | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
warren | "Shouldn't it be possible to copy the text config file from Chris's mobius and post it here so Mathew can use it? " | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
mathew | "Well, I guess that pretty much settles it on the red. I went out flying with only the blue on friday, and haven't processed the results yet. I wa..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
cfastie | "Jeff, all of the photos that day were in bright sunshine under cloudless sky. You can see the afternoon progress in the four panel NDVI for Mobius ..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
warren | "Indeed, that last Mobius with a 2007 did not work well for me either. What were the lighting conditions? I tried to stretch the histogram a bit, bu..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
cfastie | "Tom, Yes, meaningless was not the best word choice. The real surprise was that the non-plants consistently had NDVI values higher than plants. That..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
ttaylor | "Chris, re the Mobius Rosco2007 image, some comments and questions. By "meaningless" do you mean that the pine board looks so much like the living p..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
mathew | "Ok-- I have the ROSCO Fire filter and several others in my swatch booklet. Going to run tests tomorrow, and try digging into the white balance pre..." | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
mathew | "Nice writeup, thanks Chris. I like the tip on focusing, hadn't tried that. " | Read more » | over 10 years ago | |||
mathew | "sorry, I was confused. clearly dual camera. " | Read more » | about 11 years ago | |||
cfastie | "Mathew, To make sure there is no confusion, the (NIR-Red)/(NIR+Red) formula is not used for the BG3 filter because there is no red visible channel...." | Read more » | about 11 years ago | |||
mathew | "You and Ned are doing a great job of fleshing out this red vs. blue NDVI issue. thanks. its interesting to me that you can get such clear results..." | Read more » | about 11 years ago | |||
mark9700 | "Hello Everybody Quite interesting materials ! " | Read more » | about 11 years ago | |||
warren | "Well, a common way to do hyperspectral is to just collect a whole row of spectra (y dimension is your row of pixels, x dimension is wavelength) and..." | Read more » | over 11 years ago | |||
Bob | "... and I always run to grab my regular camera when I see a Sphinx moth flying in the yard! " | Read more » | over 11 years ago | |||
cfastie | "I haven't wrapped my head around how to make a DIY hyperspectral image. I guess the idea is to make a photo of an object by capturing only a very n..." | Read more » | over 11 years ago | |||
warren | "Have you attempted to do dual-camera red/IR photos? Or even just a regular visible-light photograph of the same worm to get the red channel? What ..." | Read more » | over 11 years ago | |||
cfastie | "The lack of differentiation really surprised me. The fact that hornworms fed a leaf-free diet turn blue is consistent with the idea that ß-carotene..." | Read more » | over 11 years ago | |||
warren | "Time to begin scanning them with a spectrometer! Don't you think there ought to be more differentiation there? " | Read more » | over 11 years ago | |||
cfastie | "Liz, The complete process is probably not described anywhere. Okay, now it kind of is: http://publiclab.org/wiki/infrablue-white-balance This will..." | Read more » | over 11 years ago | |||
liz | "Hi Chris, Have you already written in detail exactly how to do white balancing (up close, or in context with landscape in background, or how?), and..." | Read more » | over 11 years ago | |||
MicheleTobias | "I may have figured out why the images have such a reduced resolution. Some of the settings in the stitching program I used limited the size of the..." | Read more » | over 13 years ago |