Question: Is it possible to discern jagged from rounded particles using a DIY microscope?

gretchengehrke is asking a question about question
Follow this topic

by gretchengehrke | September 21, 2017 18:19 | #14928


In the particulate matter project (see https://publiclab.org/wiki/pm), we're interested in discerning round, droplet-based particles (i.e. particles that form from condensation nuclei, known as "secondary particles") from jagged and crystalline particles (i.e. particles made from mechanical crushing or combustion debris, known as "primary particles"). The reason we are interested in this is that there are different potential health effects from different types of airborne particles. Near industrial sand mines, airborne respirable crystalline silica is a major concern, as the tiny jagged particles can travel deep into your lungs, cut and scar them, impeding gas exchange between your lungs and blood stream (read more about this here: https://publiclab.org/wiki/silica-monitoring). Mathew Lippincott has done a lot of work taking camera-based microscope images of particles, and it looks like there is the potential to discern round from jagged particles (see this note: https://publiclab.org/notes/mathew/09-03-2015/optical-imaging-of-passive-particle-monitors). Can this be done using DIY microscopes?



4 Comments

Reply to this comment...


Gretchen, is there an example image (showing rounded and jagged edges) we can use as a reference to compare to, when looking at images of dust?

Is this a question? Click here to post it to the Questions page.

Reply to this comment...


Reading through Mathew's note, i don't see a clearly labeled one, but I imagine we could find one online somewhere, or in a peer-reviewed paper?

Is this a question? Click here to post it to the Questions page.

Reply to this comment...


Added a follow-up to collect some reference images of respirable silica particles, here: https://publiclab.org/questions/warren/02-22-2018/what-do-respirable-silica-particles-frac-sand-pollution-look-like

Reply to this comment...


Log in to comment