| Author | Comment | Last activity | Moderation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| stevie | "In a set, the beta program has people to post the "sets" in a research note. I smoothed the individual scans and compiled them as a set and posted ..." | Read more » | about 9 years ago | |||
| warren | "Oh, but are these in a set, or individual? Maybe auto-smooth is not working in the old sets viewer only when viewing spectra individually? " | Read more » | about 9 years ago | |||
| stevie | "It's the "auto smooth 10 rows below" button right? here are the two graphs:: Smoothed:: Not Smoothed: " | Read more » | about 9 years ago | |||
| warren | "Oh, interesting. Can you make a set which compares smoothed vs. non-smoothed? In my tests, it reduced noise/spikiness, which helped discourage me f..." | Read more » | about 9 years ago | |||
| stevie | "Another question I had was why we "auto smooth" each sample. I saw no difference from when I did this on my sample sets from when it wasn't done (I..." | Read more » | about 9 years ago | |||
| warren | "It only reads the top line of the image; this is documented but not as clearly as it should be. I just added this line to the display to help clari..." | Read more » | about 9 years ago | |||
| stevie | "the "20w50 A" was my first scan. Might have taken me a bit to get these consistent, but I'm not really sure why it was so different. I equalized th..." | Read more » | about 9 years ago | |||
| warren | "Wow, your scans look really awesome and consistent! the 20x50 less so, but still good. Why do you think the 20w50 varied more? Are all of those are..." | Read more » | about 9 years ago |