🎈 Public Lab: 'answered' by 2x2l

Bio

http://opensourceecology.org/wiki/User:2x2l . - Brief bio.

We can map the chronological evolution of my interests to form a rough correspondence to my values. Each discipline had ~5 years of study with a fair amount of rigor (unless indicated). Philosophy initially was a product of adolescent angst, the pursuit of which lead me to the standard absurdist/existentialist, then quickly to Bertrand Russell's seminal text. A sound philosophy requires a framework of consistency, which conveniently allowed me to explore both cutting edge mathematics, logic and computer science.[1]

Philosophy (analytical, a la Searle using post-Tractatus Wiggenstein as a vehicle. [Phenomenology, as well as the mind-body problem have both been resolved. Free will has been solved (Searle01). Truth can exist without a theory of truth (Roderick91)]) 
-> Frameworks of Logic (ZFC-independent constructs)/Pure Mathematics/Theoretical Computer Science (Homology + Type Theory, see Voevodsky's work at Princeton's IAS) 
-> Mechanical Engineering (hacked together an education on par with a semi-competent undergraduate, due in large part to my core competencies of mathematics/physics) 
-> Materials Science (even more recreationally) / Geotechnical engineering (focus on soil analysis w/r/t sound structural foundations as per ASME guidelines)
-> Horticulture and botany (if we feel generous, my scientific command of these disciplines is at an undergraduate 200 level) -- no formal training. "Learn as you go" via textbooks of repute. Objective of knowledge enrichment to contribute a foundation of knowledge in the field of sustainable ecology.

I've been an active open-source advocate (strictly GNU/AGPL) and active contributor since my mid-teens primarily within the Slackware Linux and Python communities. Profiteering off BSD/public domain code (a la the Silicon Valley) by selling a service based largely off free software, without releasing your code base into the public domain, is staunchly unethical(2).

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Univalent_foundations 
[2] That's not to say that one cannot provide a value-add and profit from public domain software. This is a case study offering support-as-a-service by RedHat (i.e. for businesses that need service-level agreements and guaranteed top-tier support), while simultaneously releasing whatever additions they have made from community software, back into the community. See: http://www.forentrepreneurs.com/jboss-example/ .

By signing up, you agree to the Code of Conduct, which applies to all online and in-person spaces managed by the Public Lab community and non-profit. You also agree to our Privacy Policy.

As an open source community, we believe in open licensing of content so that other members of the community can leverage your work legally -- with attribution, of course. By joining the Public Lab site, you agree to release the content you post here under a Creative Commons Attribution Sharealike license, and the hardware designs you post under the CERN Open Hardware License 1.1 (full text). This has the added benefit that others must share their improvements in turn with you.

'answered' by 2x2l
answered

Notes on answered by 2x2l

'answered' by 2x2l answered

Notes on answered by 2x2l

Select Custom Range

'answered' by 2x2l
answered