Want to talk about soil? Join us for Open Call every Tuesday until Mar. 30 and our kick-off call on this topic on Feb. 2! Click here for details on how to join!

Public Lab Research note


Compare environmental test results to health standards

by kgradow1 | December 31, 2020 19:52 31 Dec 19:52 | #25367 | #25367

kgradow1 was awarded the Basic Barnstar by gaurav81 for their work in this research note.


Adapted from the Statistics for Action Air Quality Unit "Compare to Standards" and generously shared with permission. You can access a printable version of this guide and others at sfa.terc.edu. Click here for a Spanish language version of this guide.


Overview

This workshop guide helps participants compare environmental test results to health-based standards for contamination in soil, water, and air (for details, see fact sheets for health-based standards in the Limits and Levels resource.) They post the results on the wall and determine which results are highest compared to the standard.

When to Use This Guide

When a group receives test results, and wants to know where contamination is the highest. The activity is based on soil, air, or water tests, but the basic idea can be adapted for any data: blood tests, public health data, vehicle traffic. If there is no “standard,” compare to typical/background levels or past data

Suggested companion activities:

Steps

1. Launch the activity: We have our test results. It’s tempting to just look for the biggest numbers. But some contaminants are more toxic than others. So first, we need to compare each result with a health-based standard for that contaminant. In our case, the standard is the [name the standard, like the MCL or RSSL]. Hand out test results, participant instructions, pens, calculators, and sticky notes. Divide up the data among the group. If needed, do one contaminant together as a group.

2. In pairs: Compare each result to its standard, as shown on the participant instructions. As groups finish, ask, “Who has the result that is highest compared to its standard?” Guide the group in posting the results on the wall, as shown in the Facilitator Supplement.

3. Debrief:

  • What strikes you about the results?

  • What contaminants or locations should we worry about most?

  • Are there any we probably don’t need to worry about?

Notes for Facilitator: Variations If you only have a few sample locations, but many contaminants, make a column for each sample instead of for each contaminant. Or, group results by sample location, like “by the pond.” If using this activity at a workshop, you can find a full sample data set in the “data sources” section of sfa.terc.edu

Smart Moves. Use your senses. Play with different ways to show it and say it.


Time: 30 Minutes

Materials

  • Facilitator Supplement (one per facilitator)

  • Participant Instructions (one per person or pair)

  • Pads of sticky notes, different colors if possible

  • Pens or markers (enough for everyone)

  • Calculators (one per pair, you can skip if participants have calculators on their phones)

Preparation

  • If there are many samples or contaminants, choose the ones that seem most troubling for the group to focus on. Think of how you will divide up that data among your group.

  • Identify the health-based standards for each contaminant. If they are not listed in the results, look them up and bring them to the meeting.

  • Confirm the units for the samples match the units for the levels of concern.

Placing the Notes

  1. Take the highest level compared to standard. Stick it on the wall as high as you can. If no result is higher than the standard, use the standard as the highest point.

  2. Using the floor as zero, make a numberscale that divides the space between. If possible, use different-colored sticky notes, so people don’t confuse scale with results. Note: if you can identify the highest level before the activity, you can make up the scale in advance.

  3. Place the other test results for that contaminant in a column. Use the scale to help guide how high or low each result should go.If there are few samples but many contaminants, make a column for each sample instead of for each contaminant. Or group them by location, like “by the pond.”

  4. Place results from different contaminants in different columns, using the same scale! Don’t put the highest result for each one at the top, or you won’t be able to see which contaminant is most over the standard.

image description

Image: Steps 1-4 with an illustrated guide to the notes on the wall

Strategies for Comparing to Standards

Here’s a way to look at environmental test results, to figure out which are the most severe.

  1. Choose just one contaminant in one sample (here, it's the arsenic level in SB-08)

  2. What level of the contaminant did they find in the sample? Write it on a sticky note.

  3. What is the health-based standard for that contaminant? Write it on your sticky note.

  4. Divide the sample level by the level of concern. Write the result on your note. Circle it.

  5. Repeat the steps above for other contaminants and other samples.

  6. Put the sticky notes in order from low to high on the wall or the table.

image description

Image: Sample test results comparing arsenic SB-08 with EPA screening levels

image description

Image: Illustration of sticky notes on a wall comparing arsenic samples


Originally published by TERC in 2014 with support from the National Science Foundation and shared with permission. Any materials posted on Public Lab are not endorsed by TERC or NSF and do not necessarily represent the views of either organization. Images courtesy of the Rini Templeton estate.


I did this Help out by offering feedback!


People who did this (0)

None yet. Be the first to post one!


1 Comments

@MsSema @mashalawais - thought you both might be interested in this resource!

Reply to this comment...


Login to comment.