Public Lab Research note

Spectrometry UROP 4/26/11 update

by Alex-McCarthy | April 26, 2011 15:45 | 63 views | 0 comments | #193 | 63 views | 0 comments | #193 26 Apr 15:45

Yesterday I tried to increase the resolution of spectrometer 3.0 by making an even thinner slit, which was not to difficult to do. I then found that there is a limit to how small a slit can usefully be- too small, and not enough light enters the device to create a visibly useful spectrum. Last week I was able to take a couple really good spectrum of fluorescent light bulbs, but review the photos I took, only one or two were of this quality out of dozens taken- I wans't sure what cause these photos to come out so crisp. Just looking into the spectrometer, could the spectrum was consistently sharp, so it was the camera being inconsistent. I spent an afternoon trying to find what camera settings resulted in sharper photos, and I spent some time making sure there was zero light pollution in the device. The setting that had most effect on sharpness was the ISO setting- lower settings led to less blurring, but still not to the degree of clarity that I had achieved last week. Going back through the dozens of photos I found that the crisp ones actually had the most light pollution- the camera had trouble with the large contrast between the spectrum bands, and the black background. After some trial and error, I found cutting a large slit into the side of the device, seen

achieved the desired light pollution, and I was able to create consistently sharp

With this method, I am able to identify 12 characteristic peaks of fluorescent light, out of the 16 actual characteristic peaks of fluorescent light. This is a picture of the two spectrum, overlayed

All of the photos from this research that I have posted are

including a couple more photos taken with this additional light pollution.

Also, I finally got around to dissecting a DVD to see if it would be a higher resolution grating than a CD. I had to pry apart two plastic layers, in which the foil is encased. The bottom layer did not act as a transmission grating, but might work as a reflective grating. The upper layer might have been useful, if the label wasn't painted on- no way to remove physically without scratching the plastic- this seems common to most DVDs. Could be a good reflective grating.

I did this Help out by offering feedback!

People who did this (0)

None yet. Be the first to post one!


Login to comment.

Public Lab is open for anyone and will always be free. By signing up you'll join a diverse group of community researchers and tap into a lot of grassroots expertise.

Sign up