This paper will discuss the series of the procedure and empirical processes, as well as problem-solving from the past experiences on PIM under the small landholding condition. These Include technical institutional, and financial, as well as regulatory instruments, and other such measures toward the future enhancement and sustainability of PIM under the small landholding irrigated agriculture.

After 1900 governments assumed a lot of influence over irrigation because:

* Water was more and more thought of government property attributable to the increasing demand permanently quality water and also the reducing convenience

* Governments kicked off giant scale irrigation comes as they were thought of a lot of economical

* The development of recent irrigation schemes became technically, financially and organizationally thus difficult that they fell outside the capabilities of the smaller communities

* The import and export policies of governments needed the cultivation of business money crops while, by dominant the water management, the farmers might be a lot of simply target-hunting to plant these reasonably crops.

The water management meaning an outsized grant on irrigation schemes. From 1980 the operation and maintenance of the many irrigation comes was step by step bimanual over to water user organizations (WUA's) World Health Organization were to assume these tasks and an outsized a part of the prices, whereby the water rights of the members had to be revered.

The exploitation of water resources via giant storage dams - that always provided wattage similarly - and diversion weirs commonly remained the responsibility of the government, principally as a result of environmental protection and questions of safety were at stake.

In the past, the utility style of water management witnessed a lot of conflicts and disturbances then the opposite sorts.