Public Lab Wiki documentation



Staff call notes 5 10 2012

This is a revision from May 10, 2012 22:00. View all revisions
1 | 2 | | #1951

Thursday May 10, 2012

Moderator is top person, let’s shoot for 30 min calls?:

Example: “I spent several hours this week working with Chris F trying to help him write documentation/guides. I hope this will support the goal of greater community self-sufficiency, where community members get more involved in writing documentation, and express expertise. It resulted in some great IR camera guide pages.” Example notes: (in this case, went in newsletter, too) work with active PLOTS members to write wiki documentation/guides to promote this as a practice, expression of expertise

Jeff

  • last 3 IR cams this week (end of message)
  • consolidating and building out web tasks in github
  • plots-nyc list? happy to make it

Sara

  • Goals
  • In pursuit of planning and executing H2S experiments I talked with SJCA and OGAP--they are eager to begin with working the test strips--over 600 wells in their area producing H2S, I interviewed a field researcher from Penn State who has used the photostrips assay, he has agreed to review our experimental design. I am in the middle of making research notes about the--the researcher is happy to share his experience with public lab. I made strips for the copper pipe assay. We have also begun experimental design research
  • In pursuit of next steps on indoor air mapping--I sat down with Byeongwon to make circuit diagrams for all is work and upload his code--his language barrier makes him hesitant to share and write notes himself. staff role to assist research note production?--Organizer list role? We’re doing another round of field testing tonight and I’m meeting with the Asthma Files RPI research group tonight about next steps on this project.
  • Research/outreach: In order to begin research for the information society paper--I researched, prepared and practiced a talk for SCA.
  • In order to improve our publication and research process I reviewed Dosemagen and Warren’s paper “Mapping Grassroots” and engaged staff in a discussion of ethics around publication and research practices.
  • I started work on a diagram for the tools research process and am behind on getting that working group going.
  • Sys admin--I have tried multiple times to get in touch with Chris.
  • Admin--receipts review
  • Make Magazine update-we will be included in a brief review in the magazine. The journalist is interested in reporting further on us-making either roomba adaption or thermal flashlight. She is in San Francisco, I directed her to Stewart.
  • Fundraising--investigation of foundation LOI

Liz

  • absent

Shannon

  • Same as Tuesday, prep for Sunday and Monday
  • bookkeeper/admin job description and vote, details coming soon
  • quickbooks nonprofit for accounting (remote access?)

Adam

  • absent

Stewart

  • Lumicon raster analysis, ongoing for tomorrow!
  • Closer to a SF Exploratorium workshop, I proposed centering it around wind testing with multiple tethers and create a kingfisher and they like the idea. But what to charge, and how to show them how they could join the community, the two questions I am working on.

Mathew

  • GM Forum writeup and kickstart
  • future of development in kites and balloons write up with retail in mind
  • reimbursements-- can I add them now, or should I still wait (shannon?), wepay, etc.

Questions

  • Rain Minn call regarding chain of custody--Shannon email Bobby.
  • Need a clearer idea of the Brown position- how that will be structured, esp. so we can start thinking about if/when we can hire a fundraiser- when can we expect more information?
  • Publication/Research Discussion

Meetings

  • Fundraising--sara to fill out.

Miscellaneous

Newsletter suggestions

Discussion on paper:

1) inform research note authors, include in discussion? 2) anonymize participants if desired? 3) make sure not to include previously written PLOTS work, or cite properly?

Resolution: Sara will provide annotated draft of paper. Jeff and Shannon will review annotations and make revisions. A decision needs to be made about whether the paper will be published as Public Lab or as individual authors.