Let’s talk about air quality data! Join us for Open Call on this topic every Tuesday until Dec. 14. Click here for details!


Comments

Author Comment Last activity Moderation
troyb "Hi again. I only had limited time to look at the code. I'm not great with Javascript. Two things stood out. First, it is a little odd that the orig..." | Read more » over 3 years ago
troyb "I recently received this kit and got really good performance out of it. Our camera inclined at possibly even more of an angle than I interpret from..." | Read more » over 3 years ago
troyb "There are definitely decimal values that don't seem quite right. Thanks for pointing to the code. I'll try to have a look in the next few days. Ap..." | Read more » over 3 years ago
troyb "Thanks very much for the prompt and numerous replies. I think they add up to an answer. There is a small difference in the intensity of the calibr..." | Read more » over 3 years ago
troyb "Our spectrometer is pretty amazing. Your comments are right on, I certainly recommend avoiding clipping (the warning in SpectralWorkbench works rea..." | Read more » over 3 years ago
troyb "So, to clarify: what I'm saying is that there seem to mathematical artefacts in the calibrated intensity values. This means that at least for expor..." | Read more » over 3 years ago
troyb "Also, I didn't save any spectra with saturated channels that I recall, but the recent spectrum https://spectralworkbench.org/spectrums/137643 illus..." | Read more » over 3 years ago
troyb "Ah, the table makes the values hard to see. Note for instance that a raw value of 10 scales to 7.65 while a raw values of 23, 24 and 25 scales to 2..." | Read more » over 3 years ago