**Another approach to research area reviews:** The review process outlined above built upon previous thinking on research area reviews ([here](https://publiclab.org/notes/stevie/05-23-2019/thinking-through-research-area-reviews) and [here](https://publiclab.org/notes/stevie/05-24-2019/idea-to-distribute-tasks-for-a-reserach-area-review?)), which can also be broken down into more distinct phases and distributed tasks in the following way: _Phase 1: Information Gathering_ In Phase 1, the goal is to sift through and update all the existing resources on PublicLab.org related to a topic. This could include checking in on other projects' updates as well, and if there's been a previous review, that's also a great place to start. _Phase 2: Convening_ Phase 2 involves hosting an [Open Call](/opencall) to bring folks together, to go through the collected materials from Phase 1, identify gaps and plan next steps. _Phase 3: Synthesizing_ In Phase 3, the notes from the call and the newly collected materials, shared goals, and tasks are organized and shared on PublicLab.org, tying the review together in a single post. This table gives more details on the tasks and can serve as a template to organize the phases of a more distributed research area review: Phase|Task Type|Who can do this|Difficulty|Task|I'll do this! -------------------------|---------------------|---------------------|---------------------|---------------------|------------------------- 1|Garden|Anyone|Easy|Go through posts in the area and make sure they are properly tagged|LINK 1|Share|Anyone|Easy|Post questions on the topic area you have, or that you’re not able to find answers to on Public Lab.| LINK 1|Garden|One person|Medium|Make sure the wiki page has clear format|LINK 1|Research|Anyone|Hard|Help find answers to unanswered questions |LINK 1|Facilitate|Anyone|Hard|Invite, listen to, and record new stories related to the topic |LINK 2|Share|Anyone|Easy|Attend the open topic call and collaborate |LINK 2|Facilitate|One person|Medium|Host the public online meeting for group to collaborate to: Highlighting findings, ID gaps in available resources, highlight challenges in this research area |LINK 3|Synthesize|Anyone|Hard|Review existing material and call summary and write an update post on it with materials gathered |LINK 3|Research|One person|Hard|Follow up on gaps identified from the group and post materials to help support information around those gaps. |LINK

Smaller-sized tasks
Applying any missing “tags” to research notes, question posts, and wiki pages on the current topic so they’re connected and easy to find (find more on tags here)
  • Posting a question related to the topic. This could be a question you have or a question you think others might have.
  • Answering a question related to the topic by commenting on the post. Answering questions might involve some background research, or it could involve reaching out to someone who might be able to help.
Medium-sized tasks
Editing wiki pages or writing new research notes on the topic. This often involves finding, reading, and synthesizing information from various sources, and making technical information from those sources easier to understand.
Replicating an activity related to the topic and sharing back how it went through comments.
Inviting, listening to, and recording stories from people working on the topic.
Larger-sized tasks
Creating diagrams, drawings, or visualizations, or taking and posting photos that can help illustrate something about the topic (examples here).
  • Testing, analyzing, or comparing existing tools and methods related to the topic, and posting your findings (example here).
  • Identifying next step challenges in tool development and adding them to the topic wiki (example here).
Creating a step-by-step activity or a method page wiki related to the topic.
  • Presenting a live build or demonstration of a community science tool related to the topic (example here).
  • Sharing your lived or learned experience with the topic as a guest speaker during a public event.