| Author | Comment | Last activity | Moderation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cfastie | "I had not considered legacy research notes, but I have a different view of them. Implementing some form of review has two main consequences: it sep..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| david-days | "@stoft--I think that is a very good summary of the articles that @liz and @warren posted as references. It is also a good reason to at least try t..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| stoft | "Hmmm, my guess is that a realistic system for scientific material from such diverse sources cannot simply rely on a set of automated rules and sear..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| david-days | "Well, if you look at the math that would support it, it actually becomes a bit more nuanced. (We can always adjust). However, let's suppose that w..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| stoft | "@cfaste does have some good points; clear rank topics, finite review period and minimum rank numbers in some form. I'd also agree that pitfalls are..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| cfastie | "That's very clever that users with good reputations can counteract unscrupulous newbies gaming the system for their buds. It would be cool if users..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| david-days | "I think that @cfastie has a good point...or set of points. One slight modification would be to put weights on the users and rankings. A combinati..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| cfastie | "Here is a proposal which might reconcile a few of the ideas presented here including: @stoft’s great idea of using a checklist to determine if a ..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| stoft | "@viechdokter, no problem; it's a community of friends. I've written enough code to understand the value of diverse data; algorithms can only be as ..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| david-days | "@stoft, my apologies for misinterpreting your comment. From a software perspective, having an additional/parallel process to review (and "mark", ..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| stoft | "@viechdokter suggests that I'm proposing a 'gatekeeper' but that's too simplistic and I'm not. Sorry for any confusion from what I wrote. Sure, kee..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| stoft | "@Warren, yes, I do acknowledge your points and @viechdokter 's. I would differentiate by noting that I'm not suggesting to disable or remove the ex..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| david-days | "@viechdokter, my approach would be to apply the "filtering" on the search end of the system (but I am a software developer, so my approaches tend t..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| warren | "@stoft - great start. I guess implicit is that anyone could go down a checklist like this as part of reviewing. Obviously lots to discuss, and may ..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| liz | "Hi everyone! I wrote up a description of the upcoming OpenHour and put links to this note as well as to the mailing list discussions, wiki pages, a..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| stoft | "@Warren, good and glad to see this list. 1 - Foremost, there should be a set of categories (similar to the brief list in the 'blank' note for sugg..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| viechdokter | "I do agree that "someone" should try to organize content into categories, but I thought that's what the tags were for? As for the filtering of "go..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| david-days | "@stoft, I agree with what you are saying, and have a personal interest in helping to make that happen. Without a means of narrowing down PLab sear..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| warren | "@stoft - ah ok, good, then were on the same page there. I guess the question is then who can make such assessments how do we trust the assessment..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| stoft | "@liz, right. A simplistic example is the 'tree' of the web site with one section being 'research'. It's fine to see 'new posts' listed (just labele..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| liz | "ah @stoft, am i hearing correctly that this is also about navigation through "the tree" in your metaphor? @Gretchengehrke has been very articulate ..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| stoft | "@Warren, I don't see that anyone is suggesting credential based peer review for PLab but IMHO, that does not exclude filtering based on good scienc..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| stoft | "@david-days, right. So, I have a theory ... right place for theories, right? ... that having a diverse source of contributors means just as diverse..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago | |||
| warren | "I found this section really interesting and reflective of some of the balance we're seeking here too: http://www.nature.com/news/peer-review-troub..." | Read more » | over 8 years ago |