| Author | Comment | Last activity | Moderation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| liz | "Here's their video: " | Read more » | over 7 years ago | |||
| gretchengehrke | "Hi again, This document may be useful in deciphering situations in which CALPUFF would be more appropriate than AERMOD: https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/s..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
| gretchengehrke | "Hi Mary, This is a great question. I want to clarify that I don't necessarily think AERMOD is a bad model -- it just has draw-backs, and those draw..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
| guolivar | "The question if "which model is best" is not easy to answer as it is always dependent on what the results are used for. There have been a few studi..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
| mathew | "I know nothing about these models, but thought I'd add some links for reference AEROMOD: https://www3.epa.gov/scram001/dispersion_prefrec.htm#aerm..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago |