What I want to do or know
Can we use any red filter for capturing NIR light instead of a red wra...
Public Lab is an open community which collaboratively develops accessible, open source, Do-It-Yourself technologies for investigating local environmental health and justice issues.
As an open source community, we believe in open licensing of content so that other members of the community can leverage your work legally -- with attribution, of course. By joining the Public Lab site, you agree to release the content you post here under a Creative Commons Attribution Sharealike license, and the hardware designs you post under the CERN Open Hardware License 1.1 (full text). This has the added benefit that others must share their improvements in turn with you.
You can use any filter that blocks most blue and green light (all visible light other than red) and also passes a lot of near infrared light (somewhere between 700nm and 950nm). Wratten 25 is an old specification that meets these criteria very well. Rosco publishes spectral responses of its filters, and their #19 seems to be similar to the Wratten 25.
If the spectral response of a filter is not known, you can make some observations about its transmission, but without good spectrometer-like equipment you might not really know what your camera is capturing. That might be okay if your goal is just to highlight strong reflectance of NIR compared to visible light (which generally equates to high NDVI values). If you use your unknown filter and repeat some of the observations reported at this site and get similar NDVI results, your filter might be sufficiently similar to Wratten 25 for your purposes.