| Author | Comment | Last activity | Moderation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| stoft | "@Warren, thanks for the suggestions. Take a look (above) at the two new plots which replace the one(s) you referenced. You're right, the new ones m..." | Read more » | almost 8 years ago | |||
| stoft | "Or, they are all 'bad' (noisy) to some degree ;-) The sharpness of the peak is still mostly a factor of slit, mechanical rigidity, being light-tigh..." | Read more » | almost 8 years ago | |||
| stoft | "Actually, you need several additional pieces for SWB: 1) average 3-5 parallel lines, 2) monitor stability and take data until it IS stable or times..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
| stoft | "Ideally, the user would select a "stable" ('smooth' or 'broad peak') region to monitor and then the software would take samples (and average) while..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
| stoft | "Yes, I'd agree that time averaging would help and, if possible, it sould be the default to reduce this noise component. I do not have 30 fps data, ..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
| stoft | "Yes, the flexibility is good and yes, that plot is better because it doesn't alter what is real and clearly shows the effect of just cutting off th..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
| stoft | "Ah yes, the new plots are there. However, the entire shape of the spectra has been shifted so the ratios between peaks are thus different from the ..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago | |||
| stoft | "I'm confused by the two plots. The 'noisy' plot doesn't have the signal so I'm guessing it's an average of what is left after chopping off anything..." | Read more » | about 8 years ago |